Is After The Event Insurance Worth Paying For?

61 questions have been answered on this subject - ask us your question

Quick answer: Our view is simple: After The Event (ATE) cover is often a pointless cost burden for claimants. In the vast majority of personal injury claims, there is no need for it, especially as many people already have existing Before the Event (BTE) or Legal Expenses Insurance (LEI) cover in place. With this in mind, we don’t automatically add or recommend ATE cover. The majority of our competitors do.

What is After the Event insurance?

As the name suggests, After The Event (ATE) insurance is purchased after an event. In terms of personal injury, ATE cover may be sold to someone after their accident and when a claim begins.

Taking out an ATE insurance policy can provide further assurances on top of a standard No Win No Fee agreement. For example, by ensuring the claimant never has the personal responsibility of having to pay court or defendant fees in the unlikely event their claim did go to court.

However, a solicitor should carefully consider whether their claimant really needs that cover. Any that requires claimants to take out an ATE policy at the start of a claim may not be acting in their best interest.

In this article, we’ll look at how ATE may be used in personal injury compensation claims. Sometimes, such cover may be deemed an appropriate safety net for claimants. But do you really need to be sold ATE insurance at the outset of your claim? We’ll explain how this is often an outdated view, and a pointless cost burden for claimants.

Why you now pay for ATE in personal injury claims

In the past, claimants had no need to worry about whether they needed ATE cover. This was because claimants could recover ALL costs from a defendant should they succeed with their claim. Furthermore, the No Win No Fee service guaranteed that they’d have no cost liabilities if their claim failed.

However, changes to personal injury claims in England & Wales with the LASPO Act 2012 removed the right of a successful claimant to recover the cost of ATE insurance policies. This meant that claimants would have to pay the cost of any ATE insurance from their settlement if they won. That’s in addition to contributing a percentage of their settlement towards their legal costs.

Our solicitors were against the changes in the LASPO Act, and felt it was unfair that claimants had to contribute anything from their settlement if they won. We argued that insurers should be covering the costs of the claimant when they admit liability in a claim. However, the Government sided with the insurance lobby, and the new legislation was introduced.

Why we don’t routinely recommend After the Event insurance

When the LASPO Act came in, Direct2Compensation decided that we would minimise our claimants’ financial exposure to the new rules. We identified that ATE cover was one burden they could be free of.

This is because ATE is not needed for the vast majority of personal injury claims. Most are settled out of court, and will usually unfold in one of two ways:

  • Either the claimant solicitor will reach a conclusion that the defendant’s denial is robust and the courts would not judge differently – in which case they simply close the claim and the claimant pays no fee.
  • Or the defendants realise that they cannot defend the claim, that they are liable and the courts would not find differently – in which case negotiations between the solicitor and defendants reach an agreement on claim value, and appropriate settlement will be completed.

In either scenario, ATE is not required.

As most claims don’t go to court, there is usually no benefit for a claimant to agree to an ATE policy. In almost all cases, our solicitors will not recommend that you take ATE cover at the outset of your claim. It may well be a totally pointless cost burden.

Why and when you may need ATE cover

There are certain scenarios where a solicitor may view that the benefits of ATE cover outweigh the cost burden. This is usually in cases of a higher value or more complex nature, where having suitable ATE insurance cover in place allows the solicitor to take the ‘risk’ of court proceedings for their claimant.

For example, where a defendant is steadfastly refusing to make a sensible offer to settle, a solicitor could expect a judge to rule that a higher settlement is fairly due. As such, it would be worth going to court to maximise the settlement.

Conversely, if a judge decided to rule in favour of the defendant, having ATE cover in place would mean the claimant didn’t have to pay for the court fees or the defendant’s legal costs.

It’s important to remember that if the claim does fail, the claimant should not have to pay the ATE insurance premium. It’s only paid if the claimant were to succeed with their claim. Furthermore, the cost should be deducted from the settlement rather than paid for at the start.

When should ATE insurance be purchased?

Direct2Compensation and our solicitors believe there is no need to force a claimant to take out ATE cover from the outset. If the situation changes, and such cover may be of benefit, it can always be taken out at a later stage. Therefore, whether to provide such cover is an issue our solicitors will consider carefully throughout the process. If deemed necessary, our solicitors will review this with you at the appropriate time.

You may already have ATE cover in place

Sometimes claimants already have something similar to ATE cover in place without knowing it. For example, through Before the Event (BTE) or Legal Expenses Insurance (LEI) cover.

Such cover can often be found attached to home and contents, or motor insurance. Also through trade union membership and financial products such as credit cards and loans. Where possible, you can use this instead of ATE without any further cost. Furthermore, your no claims bonus should not be affected and renewal premiums should not increase.

We will always help to identify if you have any existing cover that may be of use. Where there is no existing BTE or LEI, our solicitors can recommend a suitable ATE insurance policy for your claim. But only if they are of the view that you may benefit from such cover.

Who pays the cost of ATE insurance?

If a solicitor is of the view that ATE cover would be beneficial, it is they who will purchase it on behalf of the claimant.

The claimant only pays back the cost of ATE insurance if and when they win their claim. The cost is deducted from the settlement awarded, so claimants should never have to pay for it upfront.

How much does ATE cover cost?

There are various types of ATE cover available for different personal injury claims. A solicitor will identify what level of cover you may need depending on the claim being pursued. Premiums start at around £100, but most range from £200 to £400. Where greater cover is needed, in more complex or risky claims such as clinical negligence, for example, this can increase to thousands of pounds.

However, the cost of ATE insurance should only form a small percentage of your entire settlement value. In cases where premiums are high, the potential compensation settlement awarded is likely to be far higher as well.

We’re on your side

Our solicitors will only recommend taking out ATE cover if it’s in your best interest. In the majority of claims, where you are unlikely to lose, there is no need for ATE insurance at all.

If they take the view that ATE cover is needed, they will select the right type of cover and one that represents value for money.

With Direct2Compensation, any deductions from your settlement are minimised and as such, we offer the most cost effective service for your personal injury claim.

Thinking about claiming compensation? It’s usually really quick for us to find out if you have a valid claim, just leave a question below or call us on 01225 430285, or .

61 questions have been answered on this subject - ask us your question

Leave a comment or question

Please note we can only deal with claims within the UK legal system. Your question will appear once approved and we'll reply as soon as we can. Your email address will not be published, your name will, so feel free just to use a first name.

Comments & Questions

Read on for questions and advice about claiming...

Good Afternoon

I have got a claim against a former employer and was looking to take out an ATE policy.
I already have legal cover on my home insurance but it is a BTE policy. I would need advice on how to proceed,

Thanks .

Ian Morris

Do you have a Solicitor acting in your claim against the former employer? If not, contact us so that we can assist you in pursuing your claim. Our Solicitors do not routinely recommend that you purchase ATE insurance in any event. If you have BTE (Before the Event) cover available, you should never need to purchase an ATE policy anyway.

However, if you do have a Solicitor acting for you in your claim, you should advise them that you already have BTE insurance available. The Solicitor should be able to approach the BTE provider and seek their assistance in providing cover and funding assistance in your case.

If your BTE policy (also known as Legal Expenses Insurance or ‘LEI) is attached to a car insurance or home insurance policy, using the legal cover does not mean that you are making a claim on your policy.

Reply

I was recently involved in a RTA which i am potentially liable for. I reported the incident to the police & my insurance company. The other driver phoned the police at the time of the incident, but they did not attend the scene. I remained at the scene for approximately 1 hour & during that time, no police arrived and no ambulance attended (or was called to my knowledge). I have fully comprehensive motor insurance, but do not have Motor Legal Cover, in the event the other driver or one of his passengers ties to pursue a claim against me, for example suffering from whiplash, do i need to take out an ATE policy & will it protect me. Thank you.

Ian Morris

No, as you are insured already you do not need any additional cover. Your vehicle insurers will deal with any claim made against you as a result of the incident – including vehicle damage/replacement and personal injury.

Reply

Why should I pay for an insurance policy which covers me in case I lose my claim, but only after I win my claim and therefore do not actually need the cover the policy provides?
I understand needing it at the outset, in case the claim fails it would provide cover for fees etc, but if I lose I don’t buy it!!? I think paying for a policy I actually don’t need, and can’t possibly use, is even more of a cash grab than ppi policies and look how that turned out! If the policy was bought in the beginning but I only have to pay the cost at the end, that I understand, but I am actually BUYING the cover after the fact, a policy that I cannot ever make use of, basically dropping money down a huge hole…can you please explain the reasoning behind this, just so I understand completely, as it seems rather unscrupulous as it’s written, and I don’t know if it’s because I’ve not fully understood the correspondence. Thank you.

Ian Morris

Your question and scepticism of the need for ATE insurance is absolutely justified and pertinent. Before April 2013 (when the Government really started attacking the rights of personal injury claimants in favour of the insurance sector), claimants could recover ALL of their legal costs and the total sum of any insurance policy that they needed for their claim. Sadly, this is now not the case and claimants now contribute from their awarded settlement towards their legal costs (with us, it is capped at no more than 25% of any total) and they must also pay the premium of any ATE insurance policy if they win.

You’re right in asserting that this is essentially a wasted cost burden in the vast majority of cases. With this in mind, our Solicitors no longer routinely recommend that claimants take such cover. Whilst in certain cases (where the merit of risking the additional cost of an ATE premium if succeeding with the claim is considered to be in the claimants best interests), a Solicitor may recommend the purchase of an ATE policy, in the vast majority of cases it is an unnecessary cost burden – something we passionately try to reduce in the case of all clients.

It is important to note that ATE insurance doesn’t cover the costs of the claimant’s Solicitor if they lose the case, but covers the cost of the defendant and courts if it is proving impossible to get the defendant to make reasonable offers to settle a claim (that a Solicitor believes they will succeed with).

Reply

Is ATE cover worth taking out in a litigation case?

Ian Morris

Do you have a Solicitor acting for you in your litigation? If so, you should seek their advice regarding any ATE requirements and if they are recommending that you do take such cover, check with them as to whether they receive an incentive (commission) from the ATE provider for selling you the policy.

Reply

ATE insurance can protect a claimant from exposure to cost if they don’t succeed at trial, but without qualified legal representation, an ATE provider may require a considerable premium to insure the matter.

You mention that no one will touch the case – we assume that you mean on a No Win No Fee basis? If so, you may wish to consider whether that indicates that the prospects of succeeding are so slim that the risk of cost exposure may be a very real risk.

Reply

I did not sign or agree to having an ATE policy. Can a solicitor put ATE in place without my knowledge or without signing any document?

Ian Morris

You cannot be forced to cover the cost of an item you have not agreed to purchase and had the costs explained to you.

Reply

Hello

I am a litigant in person looking to bring a clinical negligence case against the NHS. I am considering taking out insurance and should be grateful for your assistance.

Clare Metcalf

Ian Morris

We have Solicitors who can pursue a claim for clinical negligence on a No Win No Fee basis and can certainly have your claim considered and pursued by specialists should you wish to do so. However, unfortunately we do not sell ATE insurance – this is something you will have to source via a broker or insurance agent.

Reply

Hi Ian
I am looking to move my case to another Solicitor as the one I am presently dealing with have been totally incompetent and I have lost all confidence in them, which is annoying as they have been assigned by my union so all costs would be covered and I should receive 100% compensation. The new Solicitor wants to charge me £499.00 for ATE (as well as the 25%).

The company I work for has already admitted 100% liability and agree that I was not to blame for my work place injury. I asked the new Solicitor why would I need to pay the ATE fee if 100% liability had been admitted, therefore they are guaranteed to win the case. They said it needs to be paid because if the case ends up going to court because we can’t agree on damages and we ended up losing then I would have to pay the otherside’s court fees and the ATE will cover this. Is this correct please and in your opinion do I need the to pay for ATE? Many thanks for all your help.

Ian Morris

The ATE issue is problematic and more often than not, our Solicitors are no longer recommending such cover. Essentially, ATE cover is only valid when both sides cannot agree on appropriate settlement value and the matter is taken to court for a judgement on settlement. In such circumstances, if the Judge rules in favour of the defendants valuation and you had refused such a difference, you can be forced to pay the fees for the other sides court attendance and court fees (you wouldn’t have to pay their total costs). As such, ATE can be relevant in such cases. This is only usually worthwhile in claims of high value given the fact that the claimant can’t recover costs for the ATE insurance should they succeed.

In your case, you need to consider whether the ATE premium is likely to be a large chunk of any settlement or if the overall value of the claim renders the fee of £499 irrelevant.

Whilst you can seek to switch to a new Solicitor, it is not always the easiest of processes and it is not financially viable in many cases for a new firm to undertake a claim halfway through (due to having to hand costs to the previous Solicitor on success). As such, if you can remain with the current Solicitor it would probably be the best bet.

Reply

Hi

I’ve won a claim and in process off accepting it but can not get my head around the deduction amount 25% for solicitor which I can understand but then I got to pay a future 20% ATE which puts the total reduction at 45% off my claim is this allowed and why do I have to such a ridiculous amount of ATE?

Ian Morris

Were you made aware of the potential charges that you refer to at the start of your claim – BEFORE you signed the Solicitors no win no fee paperwork? The potential deduction percentage that you mention may not be illegal, but there is just no need for a Solicitor to deduct more than 25% from the claimants settlement. We have always been of this view and work to the rule that a claimant will pay nothing if their claim fails and only a maximum contribution towards cost of up to 25% of their awarded settlement*.

*If there is a need for ATE cover, a successful claimant must also pay the policy premium on settlement of their claim. That money does not go to the Solicitor, but to the insurers

Reply

Hi I’ve just had a successful claim against my workplace for an injury I got back in May. I’ve was just reading the costs and my ATE insurance was £588. After reading your website I feel like I’ve been overcharged massively for this. I received £2100 but after fees and ATE insurance I actually received £1054. Am I able to take action on this or is it a case of I should have read up on it before agreeing to it? Thanks.

Ian Morris

Of course, there is always a need to ensure that you carefully read any agreement you are being asked to sign. However, a Solicitor has a duty to ensure that you have been advised as to what you are expected to sign up for – especially when their is a financial implication. If your Solicitor did not make you aware of the potential cost of the policy if you succeeded with your claim when they signed you up, there is a case to make against them to waive the fee. I would suggest that a written complaint regarding this issue is valid and may well resolve this issue for you.

Reply

Hi – my son (25 years old) was involved in a car accident 10 months ago. The driver of the other car disputes that it is his fault. My son`s car has been repaired, came to roughly £8,000

The issue however is that my son has just looked at his insurance cover as it due for renewal on 11/09/2020 and identified that he does not have legal cover. Insurer is Direct Line and legal cover is an optional cover. The insurance is comprehensive.

I`ve just been looking up After the Event insurance and came across your website.

Ian Morris

We do not sell ‘After the Event’ insurance directly and it is unlikely that your Son would need such cover. Are his insurers fighting the stance taken by the 3rd party?

If your Son was injured in the accident, is he making any personal injury claim? If not, we can assist with such action.

Reply

I’ve currently got a personal injury claim progressing and the company who this is against has already admitted they were at fault. As I have this will ATE still be needed?

Ian Morris

ATE cover may still be needed even if liability is admitted, but it should not be taken unless it is deemed to be appropriate by your specialist Solicitor. Before you do take any such cover, you should ask your Solicitor for their view and recommendation and you should make sure that they do noty stand to receive any commission should they sell you a policy.

ATE premium costs CANNOT be recovered if you succeed with a claim, so if liability is admitted and your claim is straightforward, in reality purchasing such a policy is just an unrecoverable loss that you could avoid.

Reply

Is 199.00 the norm for ate policy? No win, no fee, straight forward rta. I can’t see why I need to have this. Any thoughts?

Ian Morris

The fee you quote is within the ‘acceptable’ price range. However, you are right to consider whether you really need ATE insurance. More and more, our Solicitors are advising claimants AGAINST taking ATE cover as the cost is not recoverable and the reality is that it is not a cost burden that has any real worth in the majority of cases.

Jenny

Thank you for your reply Ian.
It’s already been admitted liability from the other driver, and I wouldn’t think Carpenters would have taken this on as a no win no fee if there was a chance we won’t win. Just seems money grabbing to me?

Ian Morris

Hopefully your Solicitors will be able to clear this up for you, but it does appear that your claim is one where ATE cover would not be beneficial or needed.

Reply

Where can I get after the event insurance?

Ian Morris

Such insurance can be purchased from specialist insurance brokers or via some law firms. However, before you purchase such insurance, you need to question whether or not you actually need such cover.

Reply

Hi
I am about to start court proceedings against my neighbour over right of way access. My deeds say I have right of way and it is marked on the title plan. My solicitor says we have an 80-90% chance of success. We don’t have legal insurance, we can cover the cost of the first hearing but if it goes to full trial we will not be able to cover the cost.
My question is; if it goes to full trial can I take out ATE insurance against costs of the full trial or if I need it at the beginning can I change the cover amount after the first hearing?

Ian Morris

Whether or not ATE cover is available for the legal action you are taking is something you should discuss with your Solicitor. As with any insurance, it is usually possible to amend a policy, but you would have to take in to account potential costs as and when the risks of increased liability become apparent.

Reply

Thank you for your advice, where would I buy such a product as I have been quoted in excess of £400 from the company that my insurance company have sourced?

Ian Morris

Do you have a Solicitor acting for you? They should be able to provide that product to you. Alternatively, you could approach a broker to ask them to obtain you some quotes.

Reply

I have been involved in what seems like a straight forward road traffic accident.
The 3rd party are not responding to any correspondence from my insurance so we are moving forward with legal proceedings.
How much would ATE cost? My insurance have sourced a quote for me with Legal & General but I would like other quotes.

Ian Morris

It isn’t possible to give an exact quote as we do not directly sell such policies. Our Solicitors can provide such cover for cases that they have evaluated in full and decided that such cover would be required. However, in cases such as yours ATE premiums would typically be in the range £130 – £250 or thereabouts.

Reply

I am currently in the process of suing a care home after my mother has developed bed sores.

She is looking to receive £8000 compensation but the company no win no fee want to take out an Ate costing £3200 to taken from the settlement fee plus their costs, it seems rather expensive and wondered whether she’s being overcharged?

I would appreciate any advice.

Ian Morris

It is impossible for us to say whether or not the ATE premium is excessive, but it is certainly a very high premium and should be queried. Claimants cannot recover the cost of ATE premiums on success of a claim (this changed post 1st April 2013), so if your Mother’s claim is successful, she will have to repay the premium as well as the 25% deduction. Clearly, such a fee would have a big impact on the settlement she would receive. Whilst she would pay nothing if the claim were to fail, the amount being quoted for ATE cover needs to be questioned and explained in full.

Reply

If have been made an offer of a settlement fee as the defendants have admitted liability in writing therefore I am guaranteed to have a successful case. Do you think it is necessary to agree to an ATE?

Ian Morris

Do you have a Solicitor acting for you? If so, it would certainly be wise to act on their advice and if they felt that an ATE policy was a wise move, it would be a good idea to take such cover.

Reply

So if you pay nothing if you lose, what is the point in having ATE?

Ian Morris

If a claimant doesn’t have pre-existing BTE (before the event) cover, it is important for them to put suitable ATE (after the event) cover in place. This cover protects the claimant from having to pay the costs of the defendant if they lose their claim. This cover has always been in place in claims for personal injury compensation.

It has always been the case that a claimant would not pay for the premium if ATE insurance cover was put in place by their Solicitor if they were to lose their claim. Prior to 1st April 2013, it was the case that a claimant could recover the full cost of their ATE premium from the defendant on top of and separately to their compensation settlement. However, the Government outlawed this right and claimants can no longer recover their ATE premium cost and must now pay for it from their settlement should they succeed. It remains the case that if the claim is unsuccessful, the claimant will not pay the cost of the premium – the liability for that cost would rest with the Solicitor providing the cover.

Reply
Chat with us for friendly, expert advice 01225 430285