Disclaimers – do they prevent the right to claim compensation?

18 questions have been answered below, why not ask your own?

What is a disclaimer?

Disclaimers are used to provide a warning to people visiting a premises or partaking in certain activities. They are designed to make sure that people are made aware of foreseeable risks of injury, or where responsibility will rest if items are lost, broken or stolen. Often when we take part in a potentially dangerous activity, the organiser will ask the participants to sign a disclaimer to confirm that they are aware of the risks the activity presents.

Many such disclaimers seem to indicate that the business or organiser can in no way be held liable if there is an injury as a result of the activity. We have all read the wording ‘the Management accept no responsibility for injury or loss of property’. However, the fact is that displaying a notice, or asking someone to sign a disclaimer, does not completely absolve a business or organisation from being held liable should someone end up suffering an injury or a loss. We’ve succeeded with many claims for compensation in such cases.

Reduction of risk, not responsibility

Disclaimers should be seen in a good light when they are used correctly. Making sure that people appreciate certain activities are dangerous and that risks are understood is a good thing. We all want to reduce the risk of injury and see less accidents happening. When people know what the risks are, they are minded to act safely and follow instructions carefully. Even with obvious risks, we benefit from being reminded.

However, many businesses or organisations use disclaimers as a way of trying to absolve themselves of any responsibility for health and safety. The wording is aimed to discourage people from pursuing their right to seek compensation for any injury they sustain.

Disclaimer should only be seen as a warning to patrons or participants, rather than a prevention of any liability and used only to make sure that when the instructions in any signed disclaimer have been followed, the risk of injury should be minimised.

Negligence overrides any disclaimer

The provision of a disclaimer sign, or being required to sign a disclaimer before taking part in an activity, does not absolve the organisation in question from being liable should someone then go on to sustain an injury as a result of their negligence.

When it comes to personal injury compensation, a disclaimer will not be worth the paper it is written on if the organiser of the event or activity has failed to ensure that they have adequately prepared for the risk of injury, or failed to provide the correct equipment, guidance or training needed to minimise the risk of injury.

The responsibilities to ensure that equipment is correctly maintained, properly serviced, risks adequately assessed, safety equipment provided and that hazards are marked and removed where possible, remain regardless of whether or not a disclaimer is signed or displayed. In cases where someone is injured when a business or organisation has failed in any of these areas, liability is likely to attach to that organisation and a claimant will have a strong prospect of succeeding with a claim for personal injury compensation.

On the other hand, if someone has been made fully aware of the risks of an activity and given very specific safety instructions to follow in a disclaimer, and they then chose to ignore that warning and suffer an injury, the injured person would have no viable grounds to pursue a claim for compensation as they have failed to heed the adequate warnings given to them.

A common example

Take a lookDisclaimers - do they prevent the right to claim compensation? at the picture giving an example of a disclaimer sign shown here. The business in question states that they accept no liability for injury, loss or damage arising from the use of this terrace unless prescribed at law. What does this mean? Does it really mean that they have no responsibility for your safety when visiting their premises?

The disclaimer shown is of no use to the business. It does not absolve themselves from the responsibilities that they and any business faces with regards to health and safety. Simply displaying a warning sign doesn’t mean they don’t have to make sure their premises are safe for use.

For example, if a business had erected this sign and then left their terrace littered with tripping hazards, sharp edges or any other risks to injury, and one of their customers were then injured in a fall or suffered a nasty laceration, the business would still be liable for the injury and loss incurred.

What to do if you are injured after reading or signing a disclaimer

If you have been injured after signing or reading a disclaimer, you can still look to make a claim for personal injury compensation. At Direct2Compensation we can quickly assess whether or not you have a viable claim. In a brief telephone conversation, we’ll be able to advise you whether the disclaimer will be a barrier to you claiming compensation for your injuries and losses.

18 questions have been answered below, why not ask your own?

Leave a question

Please note we can only deal with claims within the UK legal system. Your question will appear once approved and we'll answer it as soon as we can. Your email address will not be published, your name will, so feel free just to use a first name.

Questions & Answers


  1. Mahmoud hamdy

    Hello Dears,

    i have a case-study and they asked me if there is a sign in a coffee area stating the following: ‘the defendant accept no liability for death or personal injury howsoever and wherever caused’.

    I read that under Consumer rights act 2015 (s65) a trader can’t exclude his liability for personal injury or death and parties can’t contract out of this law. therefore, my question is if the warning signs never release the guilty party from liability according to this law even if the injured party knew about it. Am i right?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Nobody can escape liability if it is shown that they were negligent and could have prevented an incident that lead to an injury if they were not negligent. A disclaimer cannot remove someone from the risk of being liable for causing injury or death. A disclaimer can be seen as part of the process of ensuring that all the risks posed by a certain activity or working practice are appreciated as dangerous and reminding individuals of their own responsibilities. However, you cannot escape liability by way of having erected a disclaimer notice.

      Reply
  2. Neal

    We are a community of 10 houses set in a private estate, and we share the estate equipment (joint ownership), including driveable (sit-on) lawnmowers, and petrol powered chainsaw, hedge trimmer, and grass strimmer. We operate as a Ltd Company (no profits or shares) under a Memo of Articles, thereby ensuring we meet estate administration costs, Combined Liability & Employers Insurance, and maintenance of fencing, grass cutting and bush/tree pruning. We also employ a part time groundsman, who is trained to operate all the equipment, and in practice no-one actually cuts the grass. We also keep a maintenance log to verify serviceability, inspections and safe operating state.
    Should we have a disclaimer or waiver for its use by any of the private (owner) residents, or is is better to ensure some sort of training or competency of use is in place first?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Given the fact that the employed groundsman has been trained and you keep a log of servicing of any equipment, it would appear that you are in ‘good shape’ with regards to your approach to Health and Safety.

      There would be no harm in placing a clear, but simple disclaimer at the access point to the equipment that states that any faults or repairs required should be reported immediately and that nobody other than those authorised and trained to use the equipment should use it.

      It would be sensible to employ a bi-monthly inspection of the equipment likely to cause injury (power tools, mowers etc) where you check for any obvious issues in need of repair or maintenance and keep a log, along with the annual servicing that any equipment would have.

      There is certainly no harm in having a ‘training course’ for any persons wishing to use the equipment safely and perhaps an annual refresher checklist to sign off.

      By undertaking these tasks, should someone then sustain injury and make a claim against you, you are likely to be in a strong position to defend any action as you can demonstrate that you have appreciated the potential risks, made people aware, tried your best to minimise the risks and keep people safe.

      Of course, it does not guarantee that you won’t face acton or indeed, that you won’t be held liable – it really depends on the nature of any incident or injury sustained. Therefore, as ever it is wise to ensure that you are appropriately insured. Your insurers should be happy with the recommendations we have suggested and this should help to reduce premiums accordingly.

      Reply
  3. Rodney

    My local golf course now has many people wandering across the fairways, sitting around the greens and amongst the trees. It is a private course with public footpaths running across, if a ball was to injury a member of the public not on a footpath would I or the club have any liabilities, I do have golf insurance.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      It is unlikely that an individual golfer would face any liability should one of their ‘shots’ hit a walker and cause personal injury. Of course, both golfer and walker need to use common sense and look ahead before either taking a shot, or crossing a fairway. As for sitting around the green, that should not be allowed as it is asking for trouble!

      Reply
  4. graham

    All members of our allotment would like to use the grass cutting machines as and where they need to around their individual area. At the moment they are not allowed access and only three or four insured users may operate the machine.
    This problem started several years ago with the rapid climb in injury claims against allotment organisers.
    My question is …if all the users are registered as the owner of the machine/s is anyone particular individual liable for another persons injury in a court of law?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      In general terms, so long as the lawnmowers are regularly serviced and checked for any faults and every person wishing to use the machines has been trained in the safe use of them, there should be no grounds for anyone to pursue a claim against the owners of the machinery.

      Reply
  5. Lesley

    I own a holiday cottage in my private land, the land is 40 acres and fenced in
    , no animals or activities only a walk way, how do I ensure I am covered for any guests if injured. Do I put up a disclaimer sign and also add. Disclaimer to my Terms of contract ?

    Thank you

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      This is a matter you need to discuss with your public liability insurance provider. However, you do need to ensure that the property is well maintained and that you make the process of reporting any potential repairs or defects clear to your renters and that you identify any potential hazards to health. Given the description of the land, you probably have no issues to consider with regards to the land itself, but you should ensure that the walkway does not have any tripping hazards or slip hazards.

      Reply
  6. Steve

    We live in a set of converted barns and the properties have shared access and use to the central court yard area as well as the access into the courtyard from the main road. Because these facilities are on private (unadapopted land) and common to the properties a Ltd management company was set up (at property development stage) to manage the shared facilites with regards to upkeep and maintenance etc.

    Would it be appropriate for a disclaimer to be displayed on behalf of the management company at the entrance to access and courtyard advising users to enter and use these areas at their own risk? And to what degree would the Management Company be liable if an accident were to occur?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Disclaimers are useful reminders to individuals to take care and can limit the liability of a landowner. However, simply erecting a disclaimer won’t absolve the management company of liability should someone sustain personal injury due to any negligence or if the management company allow the area to be in disrepair and for hazards to be in situ.

      The safest way forward is for the management company to operate a monthly inspection of the area in question to check whether there are any obvious risks of injury – tripping hazards, disrepaired ground surfaces, protruding metal etc etc. If appropriate records are kept for all inspections and appropriate maintenance work is undertaken for any identified hazards, it is most likely that negligence would not attach should someone subsequently sustain injury as it would seem clear that the management company had employed a regime of inspection and maintenance that was of a sound nature.

      Reply
  7. Jim

    I run public events in a council run village hall. The hall’s built in ventilation and heating plant needs repairing, which means accessing the loft space.
    I have a detailed knowledge of the plant and am very happy to access the loft to assist engineers assess quotes for repairs, replacements and for servicing.
    The council have now instructed me not to access the plant areas on health and safety grounds, yet it is in the interests of hall users that I give the technical lead here.
    I am more than happy to take full responsibility for my own safety in the plant area and would not dream of making any claim should I suffer any injury whilst involved with this work.
    How can I write a disclaimer which would be accepted by the council to allow me to continue with my voluntary work in the plant areas?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The responsibility for the way in which the premises is managed, maintained and to what extent access to certain areas within the premises is granted rests with the ‘owners’ of the premises. In this case, the council appear to be in control of the area and if they do not believe it is safe for you (or any unqualified non-professional) to access the loft space, they have the right to make such a decision.

      As you have been refused access, you would be unwise to ignore that. Firstly, if you were to suffer injury you would be unable to take any action (we note that you have indicated that you do not wish to take such action) but if you were to cause damage to the property or machinery in question, you would personally be liable for the costs of damage.

      Reply
  8. Fiona

    I signed a disclaimer at a trampoline park but subsequently broke my leg very badly just bouncing on a trampoline. My issue is that I was asked to move off the trampoline after the accident, resulting in severe pain and distress. I could not move, was asked if I needed an ambulance cause it could take 4 hours! They told my son they did not believe it was broken and I would just ‘walk it off’ 5 months later I still cannot walk. I have a tibial plateau fracture type 6 which is a catastrophic break. I would like to know if I can make a claim against the trampoline park?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The fact that you signed a disclaimer, would not (in and of itself) rule out the prospect of you ever being able to take action against the organisation that is asking you to sign the same. However, to pursue a claim against the trampoline park you would need to be able to establish that their negligence lead to you sustaining your injury. The disclaimer you would have signed in this case would confirm that you have acknowledged that there is an inherent risk of injury in taking part in such activities as trampolining. Therefore, in such a case our view is that you would only have valid grounds for a claim if your injury was caused due to a fault with the trampoline (such as it breaking or tearing when being used). It would appear that there was no such issue in this case.

      The further issues you mention regarding their approach to first aid is somewhat of a red herring. Whilst they may well have handled your injury poorly, the staff at the trampoline park are not medical professionals and although they could and should have been more caring, their actions did not cause your injury.

      Reply
  9. Melanie Attwater

    Hello, I am an equal shareholder in a management committee of 5 flats. Each flat has a director that sits on the committee. Myself and another flat have purchased a playhouse for children. This is purely for the use of the residents children. If we put up a sign saying we accept no responsibility for any injury and that all children must be supervised whilst playing on the playhouse – does that suffice?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Simply erecting a disclaimer notice will not prevent you from being liable should an injury occur as a result of negligence on your part. To make sure that you can not be held liable for any injuries that occur, you must ensure that the play house is regularly maintained and that any potential hazards are removed or repaired.

      It would be wise to have a regular inspection regime in place where the play equipment is checked for faults and that any repair work can then be instructed. This should be done weekly with a written record as to who inspected the equipment and what is inspected. Hazards to look for with such equipment will be loose screws, sharp edges, broken materials.

      Your disclaimer should state that the equipment should be used appropriately and provide details as to how to report any faults or hazards. If any hazards are reported, the equipment should be cordoned off from use until repaired.

      Reply
Direct2Compensation Personal Injury Claims

Speak with a claims expert

We're happy to answer any questions you might have, or let you know if you are eligible to claim. Just fill out the form below. You can also call us on 01225 430285.