Compensation claims where liability is in dispute

256 questions have been answered below, why not ask your own?

For the majority of personal injury compensation claims, it is usually easy enough to see who is liable. In cases such as car accidents where one car crashes in to the rear of another stationary vehicle, it is easy to apportion blame and therefore workout who will be the liable party when it comes to making a claim for compensation. In such a circumstance, it is usually a simple process to get a claim for compensation placed with a solicitor.

However, in cases where it is not so cut and dried as to who was at fault for an accident leading to an injury – such as a slip or trip accident where it is not known who owns the land in question, whether the land is owned by more than one party or if the injured client was partly responsible for their own misfortune, it can be harder to know whether or not you would have a viable claim for compensation. One of the key elements of being entitled to compensation is having a liable person, party or organisation to make a claim against. But if liability is in dispute, can you still claim personal injury compensation?

Contributory negligence

In some cases, a claimant may find that they will have to accept a percentage of the responsibility for an accident. This is called contributory negligence. An example of contributory negligence would be a person who is injured after slipping on a wet floor whilst intoxicated. When asking if you have a valid slipping accident claim, your condition (drink and drugs etc) at the time is relevant. If you were drunk, the 3rd party responsible for the floor where you slipped may admit that it was dangerous and wet with no signs erected and therefore to an element of liability. However, if they are aware that you were drunk at the time (your medical records will show this – and you should always be honest!) the 3rd party are likely to state that they are of the view that the person would not have fallen if they were not drunk. In such a case, the claimant may have to accept that they are 25% or 50% responsible for the accident and as such, for every £1000 of their final settlement value, accept the relevant reduction (%) in accordance with their contribution to their own accident.

Liability denied

There are also cases where a 3rd party defence solicitor will refute any liability whatsoever. In these cases, your Direct2Compensation specialist personal injury solicitor will advise you as to whether or not they feel you have any realistic prospect of succeeding if your claim were to go all the way to court. If neither side can agree on liability – i.e, your solicitor feels that the 3rd party are liable and the 3rd party deny it, the only place for the claim to be decided is by a judge, in court.

Neither side would wish to go to court if they didn’t feel that they were likely to win. Going to court is unusual and unlikely in MOST personal injury claims, but you should always be aware that it is always a possibility with any claim. If your solicitor is of the view that the defence raised by the 3rd party is strong and that a court is likely to uphold the defence, your claim will be closed. Whilst this would be disappointing, you should bear in mind that you will not have to pay any costs for your claim as it will have been managed on a 100% No Win No Fee basis. You also have the option of finding another solicitor for a second opinion.

In all claims for personal injury compensation, any claimant must be able to demonstrate that there is a 3rd party for a claim to be made to and that the 3rd party is at least partly responsible for the incident that lead to the injuries forming the basis of the claim. Where an injured person is obviously 100% at fault for their injuries, there will be no basis to pursue a claim for personal injury compensation.

256 questions have been answered below, why not ask your own?

Leave a question

Please note we can only deal with claims within the UK legal system. Your question will appear once approved and we'll answer it as soon as we can. Your email address will not be published, your name will, so feel free just to use a first name.

Questions & Answers


  1. Bilal

    Hi ian i had RTC in june 2020 the other driver admitted liability i have 3to4 videos as proof that the driver says he is at fault his insurance collingwood are saying that he was driving on a provisional license and he was driving on his own but he had the learner insurance with collingwood my solicitors have sent them all the proof and prepared the case but they are refusing to pay for any costs because i had accident in march 2020 and again in june 2020 relatively in same part of front passenher side of car and they think this is a false claim but the other driver has admitted fault. My solicitors have said the would take it to court now could you also give some advice please.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Insurers like to avoid liability where they can and one course of action that they may use to avoid liability that they will pursue is to allege fraud if they have concerns.

      In this case, whilst you have had a previous accident, the fact that you have video evidence available showing the defendant admitting liability should be of help. So long as you are not found to be lying or misleading anyone, you have nothing to fear and as your Solicitor is willing to put this matter before a court, you should continue to pursue the claim with them.

      Reply
  2. Rachel

    I am a council tenant. I fell down the stairs in my home in April and grabbed the banister to break my fall but it came off in my hand. I dislocated my shoulder as a result. I went to hospital, had x-rays and nothing broken but still a long recovery.

    I reported the accident to the local council a few weeks later in May that the banister is off the wall and told them how it happened. Then on the 3rd of July as I was walking down the stairs, I lost my footing halfway down and had nothing to hold or grab to break my fall and ended up landing in a position that broke my left fibula quite badly.

    I started a claim after some advice and the claim seems to be running smoothly so far and the council have until the 30th of this month to accept or not accept liability.

    An inspector for the council came out about 2 weeks ago to have a look at the banister and within an hour someone came out to fix it. I was just wondering what you think the outcome would be on liability? Is there a chance they wont accept liability? Thank you for taking time to read this.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      There is of course a chance that the landlord will deny liability. Much will depend on what, if any complaints about maintenance issues you have made and whether the landlord knew or should have known that the bannister was faulty.

      Landlords will rely on reports from tenants as to the need for repair or maintenance and if they have not been made aware of any maintenance issues, they may deny liability successfully.

      Reply
      • Rachel

        Hi thank you for quick response.. yes the landlord was made aware of the banister that it had come off the wall I reported it at least 6 weeks before I fell and broke my ankle , which was due to no banister to hold to break my fall,

        Reply
        • Ian Morris

          In that case you appear to have a valid claim as the landlord has failed to act on your report of a hazard or risk to health and is likely to be held liable for the injuries you have sustained.

          Please call us on 01225430285 or use our website to provide further information to get your claim started.

          Reply
  3. Lee dumayne

    I was hit on the head with debris from a building. In coma and hi dependancy with 2 percent chance of survival. Property owner had a leak roof may 2017 and left it leaking for 11 mo this before repair g and 2 months later I was hit. They replaced 6 roof days after my accident to hide evidence and no authority investigated my accident. I have witnesses who saw me getting hit

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Was the incident in which you were injured within the past 3 years? If so, you can pursue a claim for compensation against the property owners.

      Reply
  4. Dot

    My daughter has been knocked down but the fault has not been confirmed, can she make a claim against the driver.
    Her injuries are minor cuts but badly bruised?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Yes, you can pursue a claim against the driver of the vehicle that knocked your daughter down – if they are found to be liable. Of course, if your daughter was found to have walked in to the road without looking etc, the driver would not be at fault and not liable for any claim.

      Reply
  5. louise

    Hi I was in a lift in a tesco supermarket with my 4 week old daughter, as I was going down from the first floor to ground floor the lift felt like it dropped from about half way down causing me to have a back injury, I was stuck in the lift and had to be sent back up as the doors were badly damaged from the drop and would not open on the ground floor it has been a year since and I am still on medication and in pain with my injury, and also have suffered depression and am now to scared to go in any lifts. Tescos and the lift company have denied liabilty because they have said the lifts were inspected a few days prior, can they really get away with this and is there anything more I can do to help my case.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      We assume you already have a Solicitor acting for you? If so, they can discuss with you the possibility as to whether or not anything further can be done with your claim.

      Reply
  6. Mike

    I was injured at work and lost the end of one finger and badly damaged another. The injury happened whilst loading heavy plant machinery equipment onto an HGV truck. The plant machinery was being driven by a third party (employee of the same company I work for) and I was acting as a banksman, whilst loading, a chain attached to the equipment slipped slightly and a 3ton bucket moved and trapped my hand between it and the lorries bulkhead. The HSE have investigated and came to the conclusion it was just an accident and could not attribute liability either way as the plant machinery was being driven appropriately. Given this, can I make a claim on my employer’s insurance? My employers state I cannot as there is no attributable negligence – is this correct? I thought this is what insurance was for, after all I have a permanent injury/disability and it wasn’t my fault either!

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      As the HSE have found no attributable negligence on the part of the employer, the employers insurance will argue that they are not liable for the injuries you have sustained, but an HSE investigation and a claim for personal injury compensation are two separate matters with differing criteria and although the employer and insurers will deny liability, the right to make a claim does remain available.

      Whether or not our Solicitors would be able to pursue this claim on a No Win No Fee basis is not yet clear, but we can certainly have this matter considered by them and discussed with you without you needing to pay any costs for that advice. If the Solicitors were happy to proceed, they would do so on a No Win No Fee basis.

      If you would like to seek such advice, please provide more information to us so that we can get one of our specialist Solicitors to discuss this with you. Please use our online service ‘start your claim‘ to provide some further information and outline what happened. Our team will then receive the details and can arrange for the right specialist Solicitor to contact you.

      Reply
  7. Ellise

    Hello, 2 years ago at a previous work place a large whiteboard fell onto my left shoulder from the wall whilst I was working. The impact caused me to have a very sore neck. This also was not recorded in the accident book at the time. I do however, have evidence of this as the cctv footage was sent around the office as it was seen as “laughing stock” at the time. I went to the drs the same week and was advised to take anti inflammatory tablets and see how I got on. From that time onwards, I have suffered with neck and back pain. I had an x-ray on my back but there was no obvious injury. I have taken anti inflammatory tablets for so long I have now become allergic and swell up/ have rashes all over if I take them, so I now have to take paracetamol. I started a claim on this a whole back and the defence are denying liability even though there is evidence, they are questioning why I did not complain of pain to them for the past 2 years and are also questioning how I got the cctv footage etc. I was referred to a private DR to create a medical report and the outcome was soft tissue damage across my left shoulder and advised my left shoulder is weaker than my right shoulder. Despite all of this, the defence continue to deny liability and it has gone to the “allocation stage” and “direction questionnaires” are being filed. My question is, why are they denying liability and will they get away with this? Thank you for your time.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      A denial of liability is not uncommon. Indeed, it is extremely common in a claim for personal injury compensation, even in what can appear to be a straight forward case. As you have the CCTV footage of the incident, it should be possible to get admission that the accident happened. What you will then need to do is demonstrate that the incident is consistent with the nature of the injury you are claiming for – which should be possible by way of provision of your medical records.

      Reply
  8. Zack

    Hi.

    I had an accident where I was hit from
    Behind at roundabout, the 3rd party are not accepting liability and this is now going to court, i was told I could not do injury claim.. although I had medical And completed the process of industry claim and reports from doctor,

    My case is to be heard soon, if I was to win the which I’m convinced I will, can I then pursue my injury claim..

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      I’m not sure why you were told that you couldn’t make a personal injury claim?! As long as the accident happened within the past 3 years, UK law will allow you to pursue a claim for compensation.

      Reply
  9. Gillian

    Hi Ian
    I have been in a car accident. The defendant accepts liability for the accident but not my injuries. What happens next and if I made a claim how long will this take?
    Thanks

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      In this case it would seem that the defendant will argue that although their insured has caused an accident, the impact of the collision would not have caused injury.

      If you have received medical treatment and a diagnosis consistent with injuries sustained in a road traffic accident have been made, a Solicitor is likely to be willing to pursue the claim for you.

      In most cases, a claim for such an accident tends to take around 12-18 months to process.

      Reply
  10. Gregg P

    Hello,
    My 2yr old son fell over a barrier fence which fully surrounded access to a playground and broke his elbow . I raised a complaint with the LA whom admitted there was no safe access. Their loss adjusters have now stated they deny liability, although safe access has recently been completed following my official complaint. They claim this new gate/safe access was only added due to the equality act, they’ve also partially blamed his grandparents for partial neglect. I’ve taken photographic evidence of before and after clearly demonstrating that there was no safe access (by foot, for pushchairs or wheelchairs). It appears they have used my own recommendations as their own defence.Do I have a strong enough case to take this further?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      An initial denial of liability is not unusual and if you are representing yourself, it is likely that the defendant insurers are attempting to ‘scare you off’ and encourage you to give up on the claim. Given what you have stated here, we feel that you should continue to pursue this matter.

      Reply
  11. Paul

    I’m 42. 2 years ago I found out that I have arthritis in both hips. It is my view that this was caused by the constant heavy lifting, pushing and pulling of heavy trollies at work. I have worked in the same place for 22 years and I have complained to the bosses on a number of occasions about poor machines and the equipment. Also we have to manually lift heavy equipment.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      There is certainly a possibility of pursuing a claim against your employer for the condition you are now suffering. Our specialist Solicitors can advise you further and could seek a medical experts opinion on the causal link between the work you were doing, the heavy lifting, the equipment, training and trollies provided and seek to hold the employer liable for you.

      If you would like to take this further, please use our ‘start a claim‘ form to provide further details and contact information.

      Reply
  12. Deb

    Not sure if you could help me.I fell over a pothole and broke my elbow and chipped another bone. There were witnesses and I was taken to hospital. The council has refused that it was their fault because when they inspected the road 5 months before my fall, they said the pothole wasn’t present so its not their fault.

    I have photos of the pothole and location details. Is there anything I can do now or is it not worth it?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Local authorities and landowners rely on area inspections and reports from members of the public when it comes to identifying areas of disrepair or potential hazards that need attention. The courts have essentially stated that if a local authority inspects an area every 6 months and finds no hazard and if there have been no reports from the public of hazards in between inspections, they will not be liable for any accidents that may happen. As has happened in your situation.

      Therefore, the only option available is to attempt to prove that the council inspection was inadequate or that they have not acted on reports from the public of any hazard in the area where you fell. One good way to do this is to look at the accident site on google streetview and then backdate the view to a previous year. If the hazard/defect is visible in that dated image (dated BEFORE the councils previous inspection), proving that they have missed the hazard on their inspection is possible and a claim can proceed.

      We would certainly be happy to look in to this matter for you. If you could email the accident site images and location to me, I will make investigations for you. You can contact me at: ian@direct2compensation.co.uk

      Reply
  13. Suzy

    I was burned by an IPL laser hair treatment procedure in January. I had initially gone in for laser hair removal. I signed consent to undergo hair removal treatment also signing that I understood the risks.my treatment for hair removal went well without any issues. On my second treatment, the technician suggested I try the ipl on some pigmentation spots on my face. She thought it would be useful but did not explain any risks or ask me to sign my understanding of ipl and pigmentation treatment. I trusted her and went ahead as all went well with the hair removal. I was left with burns, blistering and scarring after the treatment. I put in a claim and they have now come back and denied liability based on the form that I had initially signed for hair treatment. I am working with a solicitor who is preparing a response to their denial. Any advice on anything I can do for a positive outcome? Thanks

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      We would anticipate that your Solicitor will argue that the two treatments were separate and that you were not correctly advised on the 2nd treatment for which you are seeking damages. The providers failure to ensure that you signed a separate consent and were provided with the detailed risks for that treatment should form the heart of your claim and as your Solicitor is continuing to pursue this matter, it indicates that they have confidence of succeeding.

      Reply
  14. Tamzin

    Hi I was hit from behind by a lorry at a roundabout. They have admitted liability and admitted a breach of duty. However we are still fighting for compensation for our whiplash claims. We have 2 doctors medical reports and physiotherapy reports all backing our claim we have had to prove jobs and our education history and now to add to the 10 months of stress and worry the defendant products a report from a vehicle specialist how says from the evidence the defendant provide yes the accident happened but they whiplash didn’t and if we go to court and the court sides with the defendant we will be find to be fraudulent. This is all very upsetting and worring as we have done nothing wrong we where sat still at a roundabout and they hit us. Is this a bullying tack tick from the defendant and is they a normal thing. As our solicitor never answers and when they do they just tell us to keep moving forward. However it’s not them that has to go through this.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      As long as your Solicitor continues to back you and wants to fight your claim, you should not be concerned – despite the obvious stress caused to you. The defendant are not denying the accident or liability for it, but appear to be claiming that the velocity of the impact was too slow to cause injury. Your Solicitor should be able to counter the defendants argument by providing the evidence of your medical assessments and physiotherapist notes.

      Reply
  15. Paul

    I was the injured party around 2 years ago were by a lorry crashed into my car, they have accepted full liability, I haven’t sought legal representation in the matter yet though my car was scrapped, I was traumatised and have suffered with hip pain (I’m only 40 years old) since the incident, can I seek compensation? If so what kind of compensation could I expect?

    Thanks

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      As the accident was around 2 years ago, you can still pursue a claim – UK law affords you a maximum claim limitation period of 3 years from the date of the accident in which you can make a claim.

      As you have around 12 months remaining, it is vital that you act now and avoid any further delay in pursuing your claim as we’ll need as much time as possible to ensure that your claim has the best chance of succeeding.

      Please call us on 01225430285 to start your claim. We’ll need to obtain some initial information about the accident and can then pass this to our specialist Solicitors to have this pursued for you.

      Reply
  16. Gemma

    Hi i had an accident and fell down a 5 inch deep pothole on a crossing in the road.
    The council have denied liability. What do you think my chances would be will it go to court? I injured my foot really badly i fractured it in 2 places and ruptured my achilles tendon and still cant walk on it. Its been 10 weeks since the accident

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Have you got a Solicitor acting on this? If not, please call us on 01225430285 so that we can get our specialist Solicitors to pursue this for you.

      Reply
  17. Dave

    Hi. I went into a room in work following a power cut. There were no signs alerting me to any danger and I had not been in this room before. I walked in and fell approx 1ft in height. Injuring my back, shoulders and hips. I have learnt today that the 3rd party deny liability, do I just forget this and put it down to experience?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      What was it you fell down? If it was simply a set of steps/stairs that you couldn’t see because it was dark (because of a power cut), there is little that could be done in terms of making a claim. The employer is not at fault for the power outage.

      Who instructed you to go in to the room where you fell?

      Reply
  18. Lisa

    I was proceeding in the outside lane round a roundabout and a third party on the inside lane. On exiting the roundabout the third party moved into the outside lane to overtake a slow moving van and collided with me causing a good deal of damage. They are denying liability and saying I moved into their lane. Having requested and received dashcam footage, my solicitor says it clearly shows them moving across into my lane causing the collision. The third party however are still disputing liability and we have to issue court proceedings. Is this likely to go to court and succeed?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Given the apparent supporting evidence you have, which has been viewed by your Solicitor, it is hard to understand the course of action being taken by the defendant in this matter. If the evidence is shown to a Judge, it is likely to see the defendant lose the case.

      Reply
  19. Normal

    Hi

    I was a passenger involved a car crash, the other driver crashed into us, we indicated to turn onto a road from a main road, and he tried to over take us (speeding and driving wrong side of road) and as we turned, he hit the car, the car flipped multiple times landing on the roof, I spent a week in hospital as I had a brain injury from it and still can’t walk very good. he was drink driving and got arrested for it. He’s denying liabilty, is this normal? How can I get them to admit liabilty?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      As the 3rd party driver was arrested for driving whilst under the influence of alcohol, he and his insurers will be hard pressed to deny liability. Further, as he was the vehicle at the rear, he had a responsibility to notice the indication of the driver of your car to turn. His failure to do so should see liability placed at his feet.

      As the passenger in this accident, you are in a strong position. If for some reason, liability remains denied, you cannot be liable so can still pursue a passenger injury claim.

      Reply
  20. Cherelle

    Hi I had a car accident last June, I was hit from behind by a van whilst stationary (I was sitting at the traffic lights). I thought the accident was minor as I only “banged my knee”. However, one year later, I’m still on antibiotics for what was thought to be a reoccurring knee infection. I saw a orthopaedic surgeon who said it is calcium build up on the knee joint. First question he asked was have you had any trauma? I mentioned the accident a year ago and his response to which was that he was almost certain that the collision had triggered the calcinosis. The 3rd party keep denying any liability which amazes me! A year later I’m still on antibiotics, regularly attend physio and have reduced mobility in my knee.

    Any advice is appreciated.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Do you have a specialist Solicitor acting for you in this case? If not, please call us on 01225430285 so that we can get a specialist on to this for you on our No Win No Fee terms.

      If you already have a Solicitor, they should be able to explain why the defendants refusal to accept liability has been consistent and whether there is anything that can be done to overturn their refusal to cooperate. With regards to the denial of liability, it is important to note whether the defendant denies liability for the accident, or whether they deny that the collision could have caused the injury sustained.

      If the collision was ‘slight’ and the damage to any vehicles also ‘slight’ the defendant may admit liability for any damage to the vehicle, but deny that the force of the collision was consistent with the claim for the injury. Effectively, this would be a denial on the grounds of causation – that is that they do not accept that the collision could have caused the injury. This defence is commonly known as ‘Low Velocity Impact’ or LVI.

      If however, they simply deny liability in full (both for the collision and any injury/loss), it is hard to explain how or why! As a stationary driver, you cannot be the liable party if you were hit from behind.

      Reply
  21. Anne

    Hi, i was involved in a collision with another car in a car park . i was leaving a back car park going past the entrance of a front car park when a person that was waiting decided to turn into the entrance resulting in him driving into the side of my car . I saw him coming and reacted in breaking so my car was stationary . They are claiming its my fault and of course i am disputing otherwise. both insurance companies are still in discussion even though this happened almost a year ago. The passenger is now claiming whip lash injury even though in paperwork from their solicitors she states she has had no injury and isn’t being treated for any she is now stating she has had physiotherapy, They are also stating the accident was my fault because of my negligence as a driver . On the court paperwork there are a lot of things that are not true . Unsure what to do . Thank you.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      In the scenario you describe, it is vital that your own insurers are made aware fully of your version of events and why you dispute the view of the 3rd party in alleging that you are the at fault party.

      Have you returned to the site and taken photographs that you could then annotate with arrows etc to show locations and direction of travel? Also, providing an accident site sketch, again showing vehicle locations and direction of travel may well help.

      Reply
  22. Robert

    I slipped on metal access steps at work 3 years ago and broke a bone in my hand. The next day I went in early in the morning to let them know what the hospital result was and that I was probably unfit for work. While walking the site looking for my supervisor I took a photo of the bare metal treads and general photos of the steps. Filled out the accident report book and went on sick leave. Now, literally, that day, after I had spoken to my supervisor and left they altered the steps and added the special non slip covering that is on other steps like them on the site. I was not aware of this until on making a claim my solicitor received an outright denial of any liability and they sent her photos of the steps with the new handrail and non slip coverings on the treads. She, of course, was able to provide my photos taken the morning after the accident!
    Now, to my question. If this ever goes to court, and they have been dragging their heels all the way, would the fact that they tried to falsely claim the steps had non slip coverings on the treads go against them in court?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Given that the other steps on the site were apparently already covered with a non-slip surface and handrail and the steps where you fell appear to have been the only set ignored, it is hard to see how the employer could deny liability. As they have clearly already appreciated that the steps are a hazard without the non-slip surface and handrails fitted, there is no obvious reason as to how they can deny liability.

      Reply
  23. Gaynor

    Hi
    I broke my ankle and have been off work for 9 weeks. I went over on it down a pot hole that was 2 inches deep on a council walk way, whilst walking my dog. I have all photos even one of my x-ray . I also had 2 witness with me at the time.

    I didn’t report it to the council but then pursued a claim 1 week later. My claimant company have said the council have denied responsibility and they are referring back as a ‘non MOJ’?! What does this mean and can the council keep denying when I have evidence?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The reality is that it is becoming harder and harder to successfully pursue claims for tripping accident compensation, especially against local authorities and highways agencies. The courts tend to lean towards defendants in such claims and if there is any scope to deny liability, no matter how tenuous, local councils will do so. Therefore, it is vitally important to ensure that whoever is representing you in your claim for personal injury compensation is a specialist Solicitor with a proven track record of success in matters relating to public liability tripping accident compensation.

      In your case, it would appear that whoever is handling your claim has had to take it out of the MoJ claims portal. This can happen where there are denials of liability. Have you asked your claims handler if they intend to continue pursuit of your claim?

      When it comes to succeeding with a claim for tripping accident compensation, a claimant must demonstrate that the hazard has been in situ for a considerable time – usually at least 6 months and that the local authority or landowner ought to have known it was present (if they had conducted adequate local inspections etc) and therefore repaired the hazard. If a local authority or landowner can produce evidence that they have inspected the accident site in the 6 months prior to the incident and found no defect to repair and that no member of the public had reported any disrepair in the intervening period, the local authority will be deemed to be not liable.

      If your Solicitor is no longer willing to pursue your claim, please feel free to ask us for a 2nd opinion.

      Reply
  24. Arran

    I had a road traffic accident back last year, i was in a van stationary at the time, engine off, seat belt off, talking to someone with my head out the window, when someone in a single car transporter reversed into me. It jolted me forward causing soft tissue injury to shoulder and whiplash of the neck. Ive had 2 medicals due to shoulder soft tissue not healing in the original timescale of 4months. I went to drs at first available opportunity when it happened. When the accident happened the 3rd party immediately denied any wrong doing and refused to give me any details until i threatened to call police, even then he gave me a fake name, but i have registration plate and pictures of the scene of the accident. My solicitor sent off my medical 22 days ago expecting to hear back with an offer, instead i have my solicitor asking me questions which not sure what it leads to yet as unable to view attachment they sent, but i have seen the trail of emails between my solicitor and 3rd party’s insurers and it seems they are denying it with a counter claim of trying to saying i’m being dishonest despite photographic proof given, and have even asked to see and inspect the vehicle in question which was a company vehicle, which was one they had hired at the time. I have now left the company and the vehicle has long been sent back to the place it was on hire from. The photos showed the slight damage to the vehicle so i don’t see why they are denying it. Is this a common process to deny and want to inspect the vehicle?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      It would seem that the 3rd party are not denying the incident happened or even denying that their insured driver was the at fault party. They are however denying that the force of the impact could have caused you the injury you have presented them with. This situation is called a Low Velocity Impact or LVI matter. Where the impact speed was low, an insurer may admit the incident happened, but claim that the injury could not have been caused. They deny any causal link between the incident and your injury.

      Your Solicitor should discuss this with you as it is quite common where vehicle damage is slight for an insurer to attempt to avoid paying personal injury costs on top of any vehicle repair costs. It does not mean that your claim is dead in the water as your Solicitor may have sufficient medical evidence to rebuff their denial and if your after the event insurers are willing to proceed further with this matter, then you may still be able to succeed. This is certainly something you should be discussing with your Solicitor asap.

      Reply
  25. Lea

    Hi,

    I slipped in multi-storey car park due to bad weather there were no wet floor signs, I had reported this to the manager and they never noted the incident, there were stacks of wet floor signs that weren’t being used! They have denied liability saying that there were signs on the walls (which the manager never said) and it’s not a pedestrian walkway, but I’m not familiar with this car park so I wouldn’t know and didn’t neither sign warning for wet floor or where the pedestrian walk ways are. Will my claim be completely closed now?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Have you had your claim pursued by a specialist Personal Injury Solicitor? If so, have they checked whether the signs that the defendant has said were on the walls were present? Has the defendant provided evidence of the signs being in situ?

      Reply
  26. Nicola

    Hello, someone went into the back of my vehicle when i was stationary 3 months ago. I hit my head full whack on the steering wheel and my car went into a car infront. After a minute or so i got out of my car and the man in his car behind was on his mobile phone still sat in his car, i went over and he was telling me to f-off!!
    He wouldn’t give me his details so i got my phone and took a picture of his car, my back bumper was coming away and the front bumper was loose all around too. Im not sure if there was damage to the vehicle infront of me but i went over to him (it was a taxi) and the taxi driver said his car is fine, i told him can he please take my number so he can call me and then i have a witness. So he took my number but he never rang. My work was 2 minutes away and as i got there i rang the police and they gave me a crime reference number. I rang the doctors as i had shooting pains in my neck and a pounding headache (doctors didnt want to know, they said any road traffic accident, to go straight to a&e) so i left work and went straight to a&e, i had a full examination and from a medical expert i was told i had severe whip lash as my the muscles in my neck and shoulder had been torn. I was given codine. I went to Work the next day and told my manager i had to do light duties because i couldn’t move my left arm as it severely caused alot of pain. In the mean time, my car has been deemed a catergory N write off. They have sent out a hire vehicle.. I have had this vehicle 5 weeks now with still nothing from the third party insurance to pay out a payment of what the car is worth. I had my medical which confirmed whip lash, and needed physiotherapy.
    My solicitor told me that i should send an offer of £3500 to the third party to pay out for personal injury but they are denying any of it saying the crash was too minor for me to have any of these injuries…
    How could they know it was only minor? Especially when my car has been deemed a write off, ive had a medical expert confirm my injuries and at a medical too and my manager was informed i had to go on light duties.
    My solicitor is now asking for my employers details so they can confirm i did have time off work that day that i went to the hospital and that i was put on light duties.
    Im confused as i dont know what happens from here, now that the 3rd party has responded and decline an offer, what actually happens now?
    Thanks 🙂

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Your Solicitor will continue to represent you through this process. The key thing for you to do is ensure that you communicate with your Solicitor and give them any supporting evidence you can provide. If your insurers have deemed your vehicle to be an economic write off, you could provide repair estimates and photographs of the damage and that may well be sufficient to force the insurers to play ball and make a sensible offer to settle.

      Reply
  27. Kate

    I had a accident in 2017. My claim is going through, but my solicitor is not helping me with any paperwork work and I have to deal with it and answer the questions all on my own.

    Now the defendant as come up with cctv footage with me driving at work 15 months after my accident stating I have lied about the whole claim – which I haven’t.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      When a defendant makes an allegation of dishonesty by a claimant, it is a serious matter. However, their allegation is just that – an allegation and not necessarily fact. Your Solicitor should discuss the allegation with you and seek your explanation in order to overturn their view that you have lied about your claim.

      If you are not happy with your Solicitor and their handling of your claim, make a formal complaint via their published complaints policy and a senior partner within that firm will review the complaint and consider whether or not the matter has been handled poorly.

      Reply
  28. Mark Matthew

    I had an accident almost 2 years ago which resulted in me having problems with my spine ever since the fall.
    My solicitor has told me that there are 3 separate party’s at fault of which none are accepting liability for the steps that crumbled under my feet when I fell. My solicitor is now in the process of writing to a Barrister, which I presume will put all 3 parties at fault. My question is can and will this be resolved in court??? Many thanks Mark.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      In matters where defendants deny liability one of two things will happen. Either the claimant Solicitor will review the denials and consider them to be worthy and strong and close the claim or the claimant Solicitor will consider the denials weak and without legal standing and seek Counsel opinion (Barrister) to then pursue the claims further and bring the decision on liability to a Judge in court.

      A Judge most certainly can resolve this matter in your favour and if your Solicitor feels that taking the matter to court is a viable next step, you should go with their advice and pursue this further.

      Reply
  29. Andrea

    I was knocked down and sustained multiple injuries by a reversing van the driver in a magistrates court was found not guilty due to beyond reasonable doubt of guilt not able to be proved as no one was there to witness it.
    Can I still claim compensation for my injuries as I was just the victim?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      You can still pursue a claim if the van driver accepts that they hit you. If the van driver denies ever coming in to contact with you and you have no witnesses to confirm that they did cause you injury, your claim would fail in the same way that the magistrate case was found unproven against the van driver.

      Reply
  30. Vasantha

    I was hit by a car park barrier in the dark a few weeks ago. It was dark, raining heavily and very windy. The pavement is very narrow and at the bottom of a hill which made it difficult to walk down. I suffering a huge gash in my forehead and down the left side of my face as the solid metal barrier struck me. There was no flashing light or signal to warn that the barrier was coming down and no attendant to help me as I was bleeding badly. The local council has denied liability. These barriers should at least have a safety covering at the end to prevent injury if they strikes someone in the dark. What should I do now that the council has refused to accept liability?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The fact that the local authority have denied liability should not in and of itself make you give up and leave a claim. Our Solicitors would be happy to discuss this matter with you and can advise as to whether or not they can take this matter further for you.

      Let us know when you would like a member of our team to call you and we’ll be in touch to take some additional information and then pass this matter over to our Solicitors.

      Reply
      • Vasantha

        Thank you. I will try to get in touch in due course as I am still recovering slowly from my injuries and need some time to get myself together!

        Reply
        • Ian Morris

          Please do contact us as and when you feel a little better. In the meantime, if you can get someone to visit the site and take photographs of the barrier and the lack of lighting/warning, it would be a good idea.

          Reply
  31. Dariusz

    I was injured during my training. The employer sent me to a training provider and during exercise I sustained a neck injury.
    Who am i claiming against?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      In this scenario, a claim would be against the training provider as they would have responsibility for your safety and well-being whilst providing your training. Our Solicitors have pursued claims for people injured during training courses previously and can assist you with your claim. Please contact us for some further help and our team can arrange for our Solicitors to pursue your claim.

      Reply
  32. Julie

    My daughter was involved in a hit and run. He drove into the back of her car (but fled the scene) causing whiplash to herself and, according to her insurance company, writing her car off due to its age and cost of repairing all the damage. What can she do if he doesn’t admit liability – she got his registration number but his insurance company are giving him 2 weeks to respond or they will investigate his car. I am sure he will get his repaired by then. Police have been informed but not sure what they will do. Can she still claim medical compensation even if he does not admit to anything and she has to claim through her insurance or will she be unable to do that as well. She has already been advised that her premiums will go up if his insurance refuse to pay out. She has been to A & E due to injuries and has already missed 3 days work – still in considerable pain. It seems unfair she could be out of a car and pocket if he denies liability and she has to claim off her insurance.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      We can certainly help with regards to a claim for personal injury compensation. If your daughter has fully comprehensive car insurance, she will have to claim from her own policy for the damage to her car – if the 3rd party doesn’t admit liability or is not proven responsible.

      However, as the victim of a hit and run incident in which she was injured, your daughter can make a claim for personal injury compensation to the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB). The MIB scheme is open to people who have been injured through no fault of their own by drivers who are uninsured or who have fled the scene and are untraced. To qualify for the MIB scheme, a claimant must have reported the incident to the Police and sought medical attention – both of which your daughter had done.

      Your daughter can make a claim directly to the MIB without legal representation if she wishes to do so. Alternatively, our specialist Solicitors would be happy to help her make a claim on the basis that she would pay nothing if the claim were unsuccessful but she would contribute up to 25% of any settlement towards the costs of the claim if she were to succeed. Of course, we would recommend instructing a specialist Solicitor – such as those with whom we work – rather than claiming directly, but you would expect us to say that! Our Solicitors would ensure that your daughters legal rights were upheld and that any settlement for the injury and recovery of losses caused by the incident were appropriate and at the maximum possible value, thus ensuring the best outcome.

      If you would like our help further with this matter, please call us on 01225430285 or we can call her when she is available if that is of more help.

      Reply
  33. Neguse

    Hi there I had an accident about a couple weeks a go, the accident was not my fault .However as it was hit and run I could not find any witnesses. The accident happened in the bus lane. So Is there any chance I can get cctv footage from the council?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      You can of course ask if there is any CCTV footage of the incident. However, the most important course of action would be to report the incident to the Police and ensure that the matter is recorded by them. We can help you to make a claim for injury compensation even though the details of the 3rd party is unknown.

      Reply
  34. Lisa watt

    I had a accident abroad fell over a broken drain and fell into pool resulting in me bursting my knee open requiring stitches and skin cut out , have proof of broken drain and also photos of the drain been sorted after words there not accept liability say I jumped in the pool but at start said I didn’t have accident at pool av provided medical records ect do you think av no way of them accepting??

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The main issue you face is that your accident happened abroad. As such, it is most likely that any action would be subject to the legal system of the country in which you were injured and any legal representation or advice would need to be from a firm acting within that countries legal system.

      Reply
  35. Ana

    Hi, I have a injury at work claim, my employers are denying liability, I slipped and fell on icy stairs which caused me to go up in the air and land on the stair edge. I have a huge dent in my buttock, I also have nerve damage, it is a main fire exit, used by all staff and delivery drivers, it was not gritted at all leading up to my accident, I have a witness, they say they have gritting records to say it was done on the morning of my accident.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Was the accident recorded in an accident book? If the employer can show that they had carried out adequate risk removal by gritting the area in the hours before you fell, it is likely that they would have a strong defence to any claim.

      Reply
  36. Jordan

    I fell down a manhole cover whilst on a delivery, the property owners defendants are refusing liability as they didn’t know there was any defects or pre existing problems with the drain cover. The water board and council are also denying liability, I twisted my knee and had to have keyhole surgery due to this accident. Can they deny liability on the grounds they didn’t know about any pre existing problems with the cover. Also on the property they have a new build, so my guess is they used the manhole or tampered with the manhole in order to sort something out for the new build. I have pictures of the manhole and proof of injurys and reported the accident to work in the accident book.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Utility companies rely on local government inspections and reports from members of the public to identify and make repairs of any possible hazardous access covers.

      In your case, if no previous inspections found a repair issue and nobody had reported any issues, they will not have to admit liability and a court is unlikely to find them liable – for this reason, it is unlikely that a Solicitor would be able to pursue the matter on a No Win No Fee basis.

      Reply
  37. Hannah

    I broke my knee after tripping over a drain cover in a supermarket car park, with picture evidence of drain cover and how obvious it is its a hazard, they have denied liability because there is no cctv in any part of the car park even by the front doors, but states on signs 24hr cctv? The claims company I’m using don’t really seem fussed and I think their trying to get me to scrap it. I would be more than happy to go to court along with other evidence it’s clear it happened and I will fight all I can. What would you suggest?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The CCTV footage is irrelevant in this matter. What should be relevant is the evidence of the drain cover protruding from the surrounding surface level of the car park by 25mm/1inch or more and the medical evidence of the injury.

      Did you report the accident at the time of the fall at the Supermarket? Was the fall witnessed by any other party? Can you provide any evidence that you were in that car park at the time of the fall?

      Reply
  38. Gemma

    Hello. My nan had an accident in a shop earlier this year where she slipped on a discount sign that was laying in the middle of floor. The shop admitted liability on their part as they said that the floor should have been kept clear of clutter. However today she has just recieved a letter from her solicitor saying that she company in question is now refusing to accept liability and that they will not pay her any compensation. I was just wondering if they can do this after they had admitted they was already at fault? The accident resulted in her dislocating and fracturing her shoulder. She had to have an operation to replace her shoulder joint, and she spent about a week in hospital. She has had on going pain since it happened and is now to scared to leave the house to go shopping in case it happens again. Should we see a different solicitor to get a second opinion?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If the admission of liability was made verbally in the shop by a person working there, then the fact that the insurers have formally denied liability is acceptable. If liability was agreed in writing and has since been revoked, it is more concerning and you would need to ask your Solicitor as to the grounds for the withdrawal of the admission.

      Reply
  39. Donna

    2 years ago I had a accident at work. They accepted liability my case is still going on it’s about to go to court. My solicitor as advised me it’s not looking good for as they are stacking evidence against me I’m really struggling my solicitor doesn’t seem to help or advise me

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Before you consider switching Solicitors, it is important to make sure that your Solicitor is made properly aware of your unhappiness with their action on your claim. You can use their complaints procedure to have their work reviewed and that will hopefully resolve your concerns. If it does not, you could then look in to moving your claim to a new Solicitor.

      Reply
  40. Jacquie

    My employer is denying liability to my injury from a patient

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      When liability is denied, an acting Solicitor will discuss the denial with the claimant and investigate what response can be made (if any) to force the denial to be withdrawn and replaced with an admission of liability.

      Reply
  41. Wayne

    I was driving North on the M1 Motorway when a Lorry struck my rear offside wing with its nearside footplate. It was a Roadwork area with a 50mph speed limit with a concrete barrier on the hard shoulder. My speed was increased from 45mph to over 50 by the force of the collision. There were no independent witnesses but as the lorry struck me from behind the other insurance company has accused me of starting to change lanes. No such comment was made by the other driver all he said was sorry. I was on the inside lane and had been since the start of the roadwork area ‘Stay in Lane’ was the sign. Without my knowledge my Insurance Company closed the claim and accepted 50/50 with the other insurance company. I believe that I have been Misrepresented by my Insurance Company which I believe could be classed as Fraud. Can you advise me?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Without an independent witness to corroborate your version of events or without dash cam footage to confirm that you are telling the truth, there is very little that can be done in such a case.

      As you believe that you have been the victim of a fraudulent allegation, you should contact the fraud department within your Insurance provider to discuss the matter and potentially refer the matter to the ombudsman service if you are not satisfied with their handling of this issue.

      Reply
  42. Malkit j

    My son was driving his car passing through the traffic lights going straight, another company car passing through other traffic lights went straight into his vehicle and damaged his car. My son was injured and the 3rd party denying liability. The insurance say he will have to claim off his insurance (my son) and the insurance say they will fight in court. Surely this is wrong as if he claims of his insurance they will say oh well he got his money he is happy end of story, and they won’t pursue the matter any further. Is this true?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Has your Son spoken with an independent specialist personal injury Solicitor regarding this accident? If your Son has proceeded through a green light and the 3rd party has failed to stop at a red light and therefore caused the collision, there should be no issue in holding them responsible and forcing them to admit liability.

      Does your Son have witnesses to support his version of events in terms of how the accident happened?

      Reply
  43. margaret

    Hello, On the night of 20th September 2018 i had an accident at work, there was an historical leak in the roof (in my cleaning area) of a school, i stood on a wet carpet and slipped down a flight of stairs, in the early hours of the following morning i text my supervisor and explained to her what had happened. The third party are denying any responsibility and even denying that they have ever had a leaking roof. I have photographs of the offending area and a witness who has confirmed that the leak is historical! I broke a bone in my leg and was severely bruised, i also still have visible injuries even though this happened a year ago.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Have you been represented by a specialist personal injury Solicitor in your claim? If not, please do contact us so that we can have our specialist Solicitors look in to this for you.

      Given the apparent ‘evidence’ that you have to demonstrate that there was a leak (photographs and a witness), it is hard to understand why the defendant has denied any liability.

      Reply
  44. karen

    Son fractured elbow on steps, Asda denies liability – need a second opinion, he said if we go to court it’s a 50/50 chance. What do I do now?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      We assume that your Son has been represented in an existing claim against the supermarket in question, but that the ‘defendant’ has denied liability and that on the basis of their denial, your Solicitor has taken the view that the prospects of succeeding with the claim and proceeding to court are too slim to continue. If this is the case, you should be aware that it is likely that another Solicitor will take the same view.

      When it comes to pursuing claims for on a No Win No Fee basis, a claimant Solicitor does so on the basis that should a claim fail, they receive no fees whatsoever for the work that they have undertaken. Whilst defendant fees are met by the ATE insurance cover that is put in place by the Solicitor (or by BTE insurance cover if available), the claimant Solicitor is effectively out of pocket for their hours spent on the case and for their office costs. As such, a Solicitor is sometimes left with no option other than to close a claim and walk away rather than expose themselves to further costs that they do not have any more than ‘hope’ of recovering if a defendant presents a robust defence to a claim. It is of course the case that the claimant pays no costs, but the Solicitor must balance the best interests of the claimant with their own business needs.

      Whilst your Son’s Solicitor has taken this view, you are free to seek a 2nd opinion and we could ask one of our specialist Solicitor to obtain the file of papers from your previous Solicitor and review the matter to see if there is any realistic hope of pursuing this further for you.

      Reply
  45. J scoular

    I was in an accident few months back. I was stationary at lights and went to pull away, when another driver ran into back of me at low speed (luckily, it wasn’t that fast), but it was fast enough to need a new bumper and I ended up with a sore back and neck. A week later, I fell down the stairs due to the sore back which resulted in further injury, but they’re saying that because of the minimal damage to my car and the slow speed of the collision there is no claim for personal injury compensation.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Although the 3rd party driver was clearly at fault and their insurers will be liable for any costs of repair to your vehicle, it is right that they can refuse to compensate you for personal injury compensation as this is a ‘Low Velocity Impact’ (LVI) matter.

      Reply
  46. Jeremy

    I had just gotten off the bus and I had all but crossed the road when a driver hit me with the offside wing of his van. He was traveling at a substantial speed when he mowed me down, leaving myself with a broken femur, broken pelvis, a shattered right hip and a broken back. I was left with an L1 ‘burst fracture’ of the spine and I was left paralysed from the waist down.

    I have a Solicitor at the moment and they are talking about contributory blame even though the driver of the van was speeding and wasn’t taking any care. He didn’t give any consideration for someone that may have got off the bus (although he obviously was aware that a bus was setting off in his direction as he can be seen in the CCTV to be flashing his lights either at the bus or possibly even at myself as I’m crossing the road).

    My view is that whatever was going on with that driver, he took no care to ensure that he didn’t hit me and he has left me severe life changing injuries.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Has the driver in this case been charged with any driving offences by the Police such as driving with due care and attention or speeding? If so, that could help your case in establishing that they are fully liable.

      In cases such as yours, when you have been hit by a motorist whilst crossing the highway, it can be the case that the pedestrian is held partially responsible or having contributed to the incident in which they were injured. Pedestrians are expected to use pedestrian crossings and need to allow plenty of time to cross the road if not. Whilst we are not saying that you are responsible for this incident, without having the necessary evidence in place to demonstrate that the driver was speeding and wasn’t paying appropriate attention, it is hard for your Solicitor to establish full liability with the defendant.

      That said, given the severity and permanent implications this will cause to you, you should receive a substantial spinal injury compensation settlement.

      Reply
  47. Stephanie

    Was in a car accident and was badly injured, so was my son, and the driver of our car was at fault. However he is claiming something liable and don’t know what it means.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      I am confused by your comment – the driver of your car is claiming what? If the driver of the vehicle in which you were travelling caused the incident and is therefore liable, you and your Son are entitled to claim compensation for any injuries sustained and also for any loss of income or incurred costs caused in the accident.

      Reply
  48. Hayley

    HI fell over a paving slab smashed my femur and broke my hip I was in hospital for 1 month but the council are not admitting liability though have sent them photographic evidence what can I do I’m heart broken I have a pin from hip to knee and had muscle removed to fit it…

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Was the paving slab that caused you to fall raised or sunken by 25mm (1″) or more? If so, the claim may be something that could be taken further by a specialist Solicitor with expertise in claims for tripping accident compensation.

      Reply
  49. Rebecca

    I work for a large supermarket as a baker. Whilst removing the bread rack from the prover the heavy metal door, which is on the same principle of a fire door so comes back and closes on its own, came back and hit my hand and as a result I broke my baby finger. It has required surgery to be pinned to straighten my finger and almost 3 months off work. My union are dealing with the case but in the first instance my employer has denied blame which I find quite upsetting. Any advice please?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Do you know what defence the employers insurance have raised? Why are they refusing to accept responsibilty?

      Reply
  50. Z

    I was a passenger is a taxi, my taxi was driving straight and another car came out of a t junction and him resulting in me injuring my neck. I got my taxi drivers name, number and reg number and that is all the evidence I have, no police etc was called and the journey continued. I have tried to make a claim and the taxi driver is denying any accident ever took place even though it wasn’t his fault! Do I bother carrying on with the claim as I don’t have any other details or pictures etc?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Have you instructed a Solicitor to act for you in your claim? If so, whether or not to proceed with the claim is something you should discuss with your Solicitor. As you don’t have any further evidence (witnesses or details of the other vehicle), it is a difficult situation for you.

      Reply
  51. Derek

    I work for Stagecoach as a bus driver. I was recently involved in an accident where someone pulled out of a side street into my bus. There is two lots of cctv and one other driver to prove I was not liable and my company have said the same thing. However, their insurance company has admitted liability, so therefore my claim for personal compensation has been rejected by the company I approached. This seems totally unreasonable to me. Is there anything further I can do?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Have you discussed this with your employer? If you were not the ‘at fault’ party, why has your employer’s insurers admitted liability? That makes no sense whatsoever and should be reviewed.

      Reply
  52. Joanne Heaton

    I work for the nhs, I had a fall off a stool , provided by work, while putting notes on a high shelf, approx 7ft I am 5ft 1, I was quite badly hurt, they have denied liability say the stool wasn’t faulty, and it is still in use, which is lies it was removed the day after the accident and I’ve not seen it since, they have also lowered the shelf’s , while I was off work, they say I am the author of my own misfortune by climbing onto the stool, this is what we had to do to reach the shelf’s, I have witnesses to all this being true

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Have you had your claim pursued by a specialist personal injury Solicitor? If so, have you informed them of the witness you have and of the fact that the stool was removed from use the following day?

      If you have not instructed a specialist Solicitor, perhaps you should now consider doing that?

      Reply
  53. Hannah

    Hi,
    My friend walked down some decking steps in a holiday park lodge, there was a hole at the bottom of the steps which caused her to fall and break her ankle in two places. The ground around both steps to our lodge was very uneven and had obvious trip hazards, photos were taken of this. More concerning, the park immediately filled in the holes (without taking pictures) using dried sand!….. It was addressed with the park the next day that within 24hours the sand had blown away, leaving the dangers exposed again. Further to this, it was a concern to us that filling in holes with a substance that gives way under pressure is actually more dangerous and more likely to cause an accident as it would appear to be a flat surface but then cave when stood on. The surrounding caravans had concrete slabs at the bottom of their steps.
    However, the park says they have done nothing wrong and the areas are regularly checked and maintained.
    I believe we have a strong case to prove that the park was not taking adequate steps to protect visitors and should be liable for the injury caused.
    Have you any advice??
    Many thanks
    Hannah

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Our initial view is that this is a matter we would wish to investigate further for you as it does indeed sound as if a claim is valid given the circumstances.

      To take this further, we would of course need to see the photographs you have taken of the accident site. Please can you email them to us along with an explanation of the incident and details of the venue? Also, please provide contact name and phone number so that we can call you back to discuss the possible claim for compensation in more detail. Please email the photographs and information to us at: justice@direct2compensation.co.uk

      Reply
  54. Eileen

    Hi I recently made a claim against my employer through a personal injury Solicitor. I was advised today that they are denying liability and wondered if you could give me your views on this matter.

    I was seriously assaulted by a young person in my care and in my case this incident was foreseeable and could have been prevented. 6 months down the line I am still suffering severe pain from the injuries I sustained.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The employer can deny liability if they believe that they have given you the relevant training, guidance and correctly risk assessed the young person and the risks that they posed to you during your duties.

      You mention that the incident was preventable. What makes you say this? Remember, hindsight is not something you can use to succeed in a claim, but if you have evidence to show that the employer failed in anyway, you should present that to your Solicitor.

      Reply
  55. Patrick

    Hi I bought a product from a supermarket and got hurt as a result.
    They have put me in touch with their solicitor who is dealing with it.
    I asked them if they admit liability and their solicitor sent me a release form for my medical records she said she needs these to investigate before she can admit liability, is this right?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      It is right that they will not be in a position to admit or deny liability before they have seen all of the necessary evidence. However, medical information is not relevant to liability. The medical information is only really relevant when liability is admitted and you are looking to establish the appropriate level of damages. Whilst there may be no harm in divulging your medical records, it would be unwise to do so without legal advice and representation.

      If you have not already instructed a Solicitor to act for you in this matter, you really should consider doing so on a No Win No Fee basis. Whilst a Solicitor would deduct up to 25% of your awarded compensation (if you succeed), you will be certain that your rights are being properly protected and enforced and that your claim is given the best chances of success.

      Reply
  56. Carla

    Hi,

    I was involved in an accident in April, I was getting something out of my car on the passenger side and was stood between the passenger door and the car and when someone drove into me, smashed my door up, hit my throat on the roof and injured my leg. I could barely speak for 2 weeks. I’ve had to make a personal injury claim to retrieve my excess, i was fine after a month so not making an outrageous claim. But they are denying all liability saying i was sat in the passenger side and opened the door onto them, which makes no sense as I was on my own and standing at the time if the accident. They have paid for my repairs which was 1800, so what will happen if they still deny, they have until 8th August to investigate. There are no witnesses but a hospital record and photos of bruising to my leg. Will it go to court? Thanks for any advice x

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The problem you are facing would appear to be a straightforward case of a 3rd party relying on the fact that you have no supporting witnesses to corroborate your version of events. In such cases, it is very hard for you – as the claimant – to prove what was reality in that the defendant was liable.

      Given what has happened, it could well be the case that your Solicitor will have to play hard ball and take this all the way to the courts.

      Reply
  57. Belle

    Thank you for your help with my solicitor. We had insurance put in place so I really don’t know why he would take cold feet. However I have decided to go this alone now. Who do I take to court the council who own the property where I fell or their insurance company who replied on their behalf saying they were not responsible. Thank you. Belle

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The defendant would be the Council, with their insurers providing them with legal representation and meeting any costs that may be faced.

      Reply
  58. Louise

    So i put in a claim against council as i fell when a drain cover was not there, and although i have pictures from jan till june of the drain it’s still not fixed. I also rang and told them about it in march as it still hadn’t been covered. They’re saying that because they have had no-one phone about it before that they are not taking liability. When i done it in jan my brother had only just moved there so i didn’t know anyone really but neighbours from the street had said it had been reported before i had fell, which they are denying, i’m not really sure where to go from here as i am still not in work. I damaged my knees and my arm which turned into frozen shoulder, anyway just wondering is this right what they’re saying and is there anything i can do or do i have to just leave it?

    Reply
    • Louise

      I also did visit hospital twice and numerous doctors appointments and physio so i have all evidence my side but they’re denying their side as they’re saying they didn’t know it was like that.

      Reply
      • Ian Morris

        The medical evidence is irrelevant in terms of proving that the local authority or water board were negligent. Medical evidence is important for proving the extent of injury sustained – but that is only relevant once you have proven liability.

        Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Have you had a Solicitor representing you in your claim for compensation? The water board and local authority will rely on reports of hazards and annual inspections to be aware of any hazards or items in need of repair and if the local authority can demonstrate that they have inspected the area within the correct time and found no hazard or defect, they would not have reported any issue to the water board and they would therefore not be liable.

      However, if any of the residents of the area say that they did report the hazard, this could turn things around and help you with your claim. If you can obtain a ‘hazard witness statement’ from one of these residents in which they can state the details of the hazard and when and to whom they reported it, it would be of huge help to you. You may find our article on proving liability in tripping accident claims of use.

      Reply
  59. Mary

    Hi. I was recently in an accident where by my car was hit by an articulated lorry as it decided to change lanes and come into my lane. The lorry driver took full responsibility and my insurance received payment for my car to be repaired. Since then I have claimed for personal injury resulting from the collision and the lorry driver now says he isn’t responsible for the accident. How can he claim that he isn’t responsible when he has already claimed responsibility and paid for the car repairs?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If the defendant insurer has already admitted liability for the accident and met the cost of the repair work needed on your vehicle, they would have to do the same should a claim for personal injury compensation follow.

      The only caveat to this would be if they were to take a view that the speed/velocity of the impact was insufficient to cause bodily injury. However, if your car was damaged sufficiently to require repairs, it is hard to see how they can argue that the incident wasn’t serious enough to cause injury – especially given that you were hit by such a large vehicle.

      Reply
  60. Lauren

    Hi, I have just had a slip and trip claim (broken wrist) dropped from an accident in December.
    The defendants have faked documentation to get out of showing liability – the firm I originally went to never checked CCTV and never got a statement from the group I was with when it happened.
    The club has now changed hands again – they do once or twice a year, all seems dodgy, but that’s speculation. Is there anyway to get things over turned?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      You mention that the defendants have ‘faked’ documents in order to avoid liability. This is clearly a serious accusation and if you are certain of this, you should report this to the relevant authorities. However, you’ll need evidence to prove that this action has been taken.

      Reply
      • Lauren

        Now the club has closed – I can’t really prove it, I’ve been sent the accident log and so many of the details are incorrect, including the time of the incident – which was their main defense evidence. They claimed the wet floor had already been reported before my fall and was cleared with signs put out , I know that wasn’t the case. But the accident log is 2 hours after my fall.
        That’s the only possible evidence I have – but I doubt it would stand up to anything.
        I’ve now been told the club wouldn’t provide CCTV footage of the incident either.
        I don’t think I can really go any further with it – just have to accept a loss and that they did a good job of covering it up.

        Reply
  61. Julie

    Hi
    In a personal injury case if the defendant denies liability and its proven 5 years later can i still make a claim?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If 5 years have passed since an accident, limitation for pursuit of a claim will have passed and you won’t be able to take action. However, if you previously attempted to claim and the claim was registered in the courts, the limitation issue may be irrelevant and you could possibly get this matter settled.

      Reply
  62. Themba

    Hi my question is….

    whose duty to ensure you claim after being injured at work?
    and let’s you are safety officer, what role do you play there?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      UK law places the obligation for pursuing a claim for compensation on the injured person. Employers should ensure that appropriate health and safety management is in place and that incidents are recorded and reported correctly, but the responsibility for pursuing a claim rests with the potential claimant.

      Reply
  63. Lisa

    Hi there, I was in a car accident last year, I was hit by a driver that went through a red light. There was a witness and CCTV footage was found showing the crash. The 3rd party is still denying liability and my solicitor says we may need even more evidence. I’m not sure what further evidence we could possibly get. She says we may need to go to court. Should I look for a different solicitor?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      I don’t think you need to switch Solicitors as it sounds like your Solicitor is doing the right things. If the defendant insurers are denying liability despite the apparent evidence that is available, the only option your (or any other Solicitor for that matter) would have is to initiate court proceedings to place your claim before an independent Judge.

      It is frustrating when a defendant does not admit liability when there is compelling evidence to support a claim and in the long run, it does not benefit them and may indeed cost them more than simply working on a fair settlement for your claim. However, the courts system is here for such situations and it would appear (if your summary of the claim is taken at face value), that you have a strong claim and that a Judge would likely find in your favour.

      Reply
  64. Ellie

    A hotel has admitted liability when I contracted campylobacter and have admitted liability but constantly ignore negotiations on compensation – I know my solicitor is aware but is this normal for them to just not answer letters?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      In some claims, a defendant will take the ‘ostrich’ approach and bury their head in the sand and ignore all attempts to correspond. Quite why they would take such action in this case, especially given the admission of liability makes no sense whatsoever!

      In cases where a defendant ignores the correspondence of the claimant and Solicitor, the acting Solicitor will attempt to re-engage the defendant in amicable discussion. If that fails, the Solicitor will issue court proceedings to bring the matter to the attention of a Judge and force the defendant to cooperate.

      Reply
      • Ellie

        Thank you, we have given them until yesterday to answer a letter with what we feel is an appropriate sum, not heard anything, so I presume we will issue court summons, its just so lengthy!

        Reply
        • Ian Morris

          The issue of defendants employing delaying tactics and being unresponsive to claimant correspondence in cases of personal injury compensation claims is something that bugs all of us working hard to assist claimants who have suffered injury and loss as a result of the defendants failures.

          Your Solicitor will take the appropriate action and will share your frustration at this unhelpful delay.

          Reply
  65. Zoe

    Hi, I was involved in a deliberate collision in Feb this year, the other driver was breaking hard in front of me on 2 occasions for no reason, I made sure the road was clear ahead and attempted to over take, on doing so the driver of the other vehicle purposely rammed her car into the passenger side of my vehicle causing my tyre to blow out and steering rack to break. My daughter was in the front passenger side, and hurt her ribs and whiplash and trauma, I also had whiplash, wrist sprain from trying to control my steering and back pain and severe distress. Her boyfriend was in the back and received similar injuries. She threatened us that if we tell anyone she would come after our family. I called the police immediately. There were no witnesses or cameras, and the police said it was an insurance matter. Since then my daughter has had her medical and physio. I’ve not had any of these but yet I’ve been offered 1500, by the other insurers as settlement. I am so angry that she is getting away with this that it keeps me awake at night as she could have killed my daughter who is pregnant and at the time too. They are denying liability and so do I strongly, where do I stand with this offer and do I have a right to refuse it as I’ve not even had a medical yet?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If you were being represented by a Solicitor, they would fight this for you and would seek to ensure that a medical assessment is undertaken to fully appraise your injuries and symptoms. Such action would be likely to see the value of any settlement increase accordingly.

      The issue you have in this matter though is the lack of witnesses to corroborate your version of events. With that in mind, it does make it easy for the defendant insurers to deny liability and claim it was either your fault or that you were both jointly liable. This could be reflected in the offer you have received.

      Reply
  66. Haydn

    I am due in court as I had an accident a while ago, the defendants who were not there on the day of the accident have given statements both of which are saying I was incompetent, would this stand in court? Also they have said that I was given 1000 hours of training which they supplied with a few dates on a piece of paper with no signatures to say when I was signed off. I have never signed no training matrix, also both of the statements say that they never had any problems whilst they were working but I beg to differ with that and they say I was rushing on the day again they were not on site to determine if I was rushing.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If you are of the view that the statements issued by the defendants are misleading and factually incorrect, you need to attend the court and provide responses to every incorrect element of their statements to the Judge sitting on the case. If you can provide factually correct responses in a manner that the Judge is minded to accept, you could well succeed with your claim. If you can provide evidence to substantiate your version of events you will succeed.

      Reply
  67. Sophie

    Hello,

    Last year October I was invovled in a tram incident that sprained and caused muscle damage to my right shoulder, causing my self to be off of work for 10 days and the mental abuse I received from NETS trams started shortly after. I have started a claim but had it refused as the tram company said that the safety feature was activated by something so called being the tracks, however if there was something on the line the tram wouldn’t of pulled off just seconds after the emergency stop. But the claims company I decided to go with, said without any proof and just what the tram company said, they would stop my claim from going any further. What do you recommend I do?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If you have been through the claims process and the claim has failed on the basis that there is no evidence to support your view that the tram company were liable, it is very hard to offer any positive options going forward.

      To succeed with a claim for compensation, an injured person must be able to identify negligence and importantly, provide evidence to support such a view. In this case, it would seem that the tram emergency stop system worked to prevent an impact with an object that is unknown – whether that be a pedestrian, animal or other object. Such a system working in such a way would not be deemed to be an issue that would allow you to succeed with a claim. If you are alleging that the emergency stop system was faulty and caused an unnecessary violent jolt, you will need some evidence to support such a view.

      Reply
  68. Nicholas

    Hi, after a 3rd party has denied ramming my car she has now admitted it but says i was responsible as opened door on to her car. I’ve got a solicitor but they don’t seem very good, its been going on since December 17, last spoke i was told 3rd party had until 4th of April to submit a statement and it’s been sent to court. I just rang my solicitor but i was told still no defence statement, is this right can they do this? Be thankful for your reply.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If the defendant insurer has missed a deadline, the standard procedure would be for your Solicitor to provide them with a defined extension – usually a further 21 working days or similar. If the defendant insurer then fails to meet the extended deadline, your Solicitor will issue court proceedings to force them to attend a hearing regarding the claim.

      Reply
      • Nicholas

        Many thanks for the advice

        Reply
  69. Martha

    Sainsbury’s sign at the side of the travellator says ‘PLEASE STEP OFF THE TRAVELLATOR CAREFULLY’ Well I was unable to do this because my trolley was stuck!
    On the 6th December 2018, I visited Sainsbury’s store in Selly Oak Birmingham, to purchase a few items and on leaving picked up a trolley, from the shop floor, which on reflection must have been abandoned for one reason or another. Then I proceeded to the travellator to get to the car park.

    On the way down, it was difficult to keep the trolley straight as the left wheel kept veering inward and I struggled to move the trolley to its correct position. I persevered and thought no more of it, until I got to the exit and tried to push the trolley off the travellator.
    This proved impossible and with the travellator still moving, the trolley reared up on me, throwing me onto my back and the trolley falling on top of me. My clothes got ripped and I feared my feet were also going to get trapped. Apparently, somebody manning the travellator pulled the emergency stop button. Two people waiting at the bottom (who have provided their names as witnesses) rushed to my help. I suffered with severe muscular pain and cuts and bruises to my back and wrist, knee and arm, as well as post-traumatic stress from the incident. Currently, I am still suffering with backache and crippling pain in my left wrist.

    Security also rushed to my aid and said they had it all on CCTV footage, which was kept for 28 days. At that moment in time, I was in such a state of shock that I couldn’t understand what had happened and all the Sainsbury’s first aider could say was we will pay you for the damage to your clothes, rather than any concern for my welfare. I sensed a feeling this had happened before and she was well versed in what to say.

    However, I took the matter to a solicitor (Irwin Mitchell) on a no-win, no-fee basis, because I was concerned about them disposing of the footage. The solicitor told me not to accept any reimbursement for clothes. However, the defendants denied liability on the basis that following the accident no defects were found on the travellator or trolley. However, they haven’t given a reason for the accident especially as inspection records show that there were problems with the travellator.

    However, I wish to challenge their denial on the grounds that the trolley or travellator was defective otherwise, why did the trolley become lodged on the travellator? The CCTV footage plainly shows the trolley appears to be lodged to one side horizontally on the black rubber bands of the travellator.
    Also it seems that Sainsbury’s are relying on just one persons evidence i.e. that of their first aider, for the inspection and testing of the equipment after the accident. It’s well known that a trolley can probably straighten up after being pushed a couple of times, but this is a difficult task to do on a travellator.

    Surely in such an incident as this the travellator should have been properly inspected and not left to just one employee?
    Also can this witness be relied upon, in view of the fact that she wrongly recorded the accident as having no witnesses, when in fact there were two who gave her their names and telephone number?

    When the solicitor closed the case because of the denial, it was left to me to contact the witnesses who sent a statement about the incident.
    Also it seems strange that although there is no work order record for the time of the incident, there are various dates around that time when the travellator needed attention, such as on the 17/12 when the trousers of a man got caught in the same travellator.

    Finally, if the matter went to court, I feel a judge would be inclined to believe somebody who has CCTV footage and witnesses as opposed to somebody who is not a technical expert on such equipment.

    To conclude I feel this evidence, together with the witness statement can help to encourage Sainsbury’s to change their position.
    I have all the above evidence.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Clearly, in the eyes of your previous Solicitor – who has seen the full defence raised by the defendant – has considered the defence to be strong and on the balance of probability, likely to stand up to scrutiny should the claim be pursued further. As you had instructed the previous Solicitor to act for you on a No Win No Fee basis, the Solicitor has to carefully consider the balance between acting in your best interests and not exposing themselves to the risk of extensive costs should they pursue a claim that is likely to fail. As your Solicitor has chosen to close the claim, they have taken the view that to pursue the claim further would likely do nothing other than cause them to incur further costs, so in their view, closing the claim was a prudent move. It should be remembered that this action by your previous Solicitor would mean that they also did not receive any costs for the work that they had undertaken.

      Whilst it may be possible that a different Solicitor would take a different view and seek to pursue the claim further, the closure of the claim by a previous Solicitor will give a new Solicitor doubts as to whether the claim should be taken on.

      If Sainsbury’s have produced evidence to show that on inspection, no faults were found with the travelator or trolley, they are in a strong position in terms of defending any claim as whilst they are not denying that you had an accident and were injured, they are denying that they have any responsibility and that this was an unfortunate accident and not due to their negligence. Whilst you are supported by CCTV footage and two witnesses, the footage and witnesses can only confirm that an accident happened and that your trolley appeared to jam and caused you to be pushed over and injured. Again, this does not demonstrate certainty that the defendant was negligent. Sainsbury’s could argue that the trolley was jammed by the way you had positioned it and that they didn’t cause the accident. I don’t say this as my point of view, but simply to outline the problems you face with this matter. Without certain compelling evidence, a Judge will not find a defendant liable as the onus is on the claimant to prove negligence and at this time, it would appear that this proof is not available.

      You mention that the travelator had been tended to after incidents and also probably routine maintenance. The incident you point to on the 17th December again would not prove any negligence.

      My initial view is that our Solicitors would probably reach the same conclusion as your previous Solicitors given the strict risk assessments needed to be able to pursue a claim on a No Win No Fee basis. However, I have forwarded your comment – and my response to a specialist Solicitor and asked them for their view. We will feed this back to you directly on receipt of their response.

      Reply
  70. Christine

    I tripped in the street on a damaged pavement and fractured my wrist. The council admitted it was their fault 3 years ago, but I have since had problems with my wrist and been diagnosed with crps. I was under the impression that the claim was coming to an end this year with all the evidence from consultants occupational therapists etc, but today my Solicitor rang saying the defendants are now not accepting liability and she needs to talk with me. Can this happen after 3 years?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      An admission of liability can be withdrawn, but the defendant will have to be basing that on new evidence to support their view. Your Solicitor will speak to you, but it could be that the matter now has to go to court for a Judge to decide the outcome.

      Reply
  71. john

    Our dog escaped and bite another dog, the dogs owner tripped over the lead during the incident but didn’t show signs of any injury.
    The vets bill was settled by use and it was put in writing and signed by both parties that no more money would be sought for vet bills as treatment had ended, in addition the other party signed to say they wouldn’t seek any future personal compensation.
    How binding is this and would it actually stop them making a future claim?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Essentially, if you have a written agreement that confirms that your payment of the veterinary costs was full and final settlement of this matter, then that should be the end of the matter.

      However, if there was nothing noted regarding the injuries of the Dog owner, there is a possibility that they could return to claim further.

      Reply
  72. Victoria morris

    I tripped on a tree root growing though the footpath. I was heavily pregnant and ended up in a and e. This happened 12 04 2016. I have pictures of the injurys. I have pictures of the the footpath and there are hospital records. This was reported to the council at the time. The footpath is still the same now. I have got married since so my name has changed.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      You could well have a valid claim for compensation. However, the accident date you have provided indicates that your claim limitation period will expire in less than 1 month (unless you are under 21 years of age). As such, this makes it extremely difficult to proceed with a claim at this stage due to the lack of sufficient time to get the claim sorted before the limitation period expires.

      Reply
  73. Susan

    I fell at work on a wet floor and shattered my hip needing an emergency hip replacement.
    The blame is with the “stand in” cleaner who was not following the correct procedures and had not put out any wet floor signs. I work in a large supermarket.

    Work is denying any liability in my fall. Their defence is that i had clocked out 20 mins earlier (however i had asked and gotten permission from my manager to stay after this to complete my work) They also say that I fell from a standing position and so that is not their fault?! There are no witnesses to the actual fall, only after when I was laying on the floor in agony.

    Where do I stand and could I win a case against them? The whole experience has seriously impeded my quality of life, I can no longer do a lot of the things I enjoyed without severe anxiety and discomfort. Im no longer the same person. I returned to work after 6 months however it is a struggle to stay on my feet.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Your description of the accident would indicate that liability should attach to the employer as the cleaner had failed to erect hazard warning signs. The fact that you had clocked out some 20 minutes earlier is irrelevant and should be ignored.

      If you have not yet instructed a specialist Solicitor to act for you in this matter, I would suggest that you contact us to get your claim started. We work with specialist slipping accident Solicitors who would be very happy to pursue a hip injury claim against your employer.

      Reply
  74. Kit

    A woman came into the pub I run and was found on the floor by the bar person, she did not ask to report an accident to the management, In fact she didn’t speak to the bar person at all. One month later I received a claim stating she had tripped on the carpet when entering the pub. Initially I was not aware of any witnesses, but it turns out that there were and that she didn’t trip but collapsed. Would her solicitor have to cancel the claim?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      In any claim for personal injury compensation, the claimant is required to demonstrate that their injury was caused by negligence. A defendant has the legal right to mount a defence. Should neither side be willing to accept that the other has a stronger position, the matter must go before a Judge who will independently consider the evidence of both sides before ruling one way or another.

      In the scenario you describe, the claimant has claimed that they have tripped on carpet at the entrance to your premises. As such, they would succeed with their claim if they can demonstrate that the carpet at the entrance way is loose and that it is possible to catch one’s foot underneath the loose edge and that a tripping hazard has been left in situ. To be able to prove this, an accident report should have been made at the time, or statements from independent witnesses or photographs that show the hazard would provide good evidence to support such a claim.

      It would appear that you do not accept this version of events and I assume that there is no such tripping hazard present with the carpet at the entrance to your premises. Given that you appear to have witnesses willing to state on record that this lady collapsed rather than tripped, it is hard to see how any such claim could succeed.

      You should inform your insurers of this claim and provide them with all relevant defence evidence that you can – including the witness information and your own photographs demonstrating that the carpet at the entrance is not a tripping hazard or dangerous in anyway.

      Reply
      • Kit

        Once the defendant has received notification of the claim is it correct that they have 3 months 21 days before responding to the claimants solicitors to either deny or admit liability?

        Reply
        • Ian Morris

          Effectively, yes. From the period of confirmation of the claim by a defendant, it normally takes almost 4 months for them to investigate and respond further. Whilst the response can be obtained sooner, it is rarely the case that the defendants respond any earlier than they have to.

          Reply
  75. Mary Westwood

    Hi
    I was coming down a travelator with my trolley when I suffered a horrific fall at the bottom when the trolley got stuck and I couldn’t push it off the traveler. Instead it first pushed into my chest and then reared up and I fell backwards, my clothes getting ripped in the travelator. I was in terrible shock but when I saw the CCTV footage it brought back to me that on the way down I was trying hard to keep the trolley straight because the wheels were wonky and it kep veering to the side. Momentarily on the way down I remember thinking that’s why the trolley was abandoned. Anyway took it to a solicitor no win no fee but the store has denied liability. They said they tested the trolley and there was nothing wrong with it. I am amazed because anybody can see trolley wouldn’t come off the travelator. The solicitor has closed the case!!

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      As your Solicitor has closed the claim, it indicates that the defence raised is strong and unlikely to be overturned or ignored by a judge, should this claim go to court. Of course, your Solicitor has also had to write off the costs that they have incurred in attempting to pursue your claim.

      Clearly, you suffered a traumatic incident and it is disappointing to see that your claim failed. Sadly, I don’t see how anyone could take your claim on as the defence issue remains the problem.

      Reply
  76. Patricia Stephens

    Hi my solicitor after 2 1/2 years decided to send an inspector to check the door in the Doctors Surgery where I suffered a severed finger. The expert has reported that the door is fine and that as a result, I have no claim? I am not sure what to do?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If the door has been inspected and no defects have been found, it is unlikely that you can do anything as there will be no evidence to support your claim that the defendants are liable.

      Reply
  77. Dominic garthwaite

    My employer is currently doing this to me, my witness who saw my accident will not write a statement however the person who wrote a statement has lied and can be proven to be lying in some points of the statement one of which was ‘Dominic couldn’t fill out the accident form as he injured his arm’ yes I injured my left arm however I’m right handed so could easily fill out an accident form?, could I say his statement cannot be believable as he has lied about those things so how can anyone believe anything else he said. It was also this persons fault who wrote the statement and also they filled out a false accident report and signed it on my behalf however it is not my signature so this surely can’t be used as evidence? They also failed to send pictures taken on the day of my accident and only showed ones on another day which can also be proven so would the court be intersted in why they didn’t send the originals? Also as soon as I got to hospital I told them the real reason how I dislocated my shoulder so why would I say that I did it another way on an accident form I apparently filled out at the same time I was in a and e, thanks if you can shed some light on this

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If you are making a claim for compensation after an accident at work, it is likely that the employers insurance will attempt to defend the claim if they believe that they have a strong case to defend the claim. In this case, it would appear that you are coming up against an issue of the defence having one version of events and you claiming that their version is factually incorrect and even dishonest.

      In such a scenario, you should make your Solicitor aware of the areas falsified by the employer in order that your Solicitor can attempt to prove that they are dishonest and incorrect. Of course, you will have to provide evidence to corroborate your view that the employers have withheld information that would be favourable to your claim and that their reports are incorrect. If you can provide such evidence, you should be able to succeed.

      Reply
      • Dom

        Thanks Ian, I was just wondering if you could answer help me with another few things as I’ve learnt more from you than my solicitor has told me in about a year and I appreciate your help it’s really useful! So as I said I had use of my right hand and can prove I’m right handed and it was my left shoulder injured, so the one statement a defendant said is I didn’t sign the accident form because I had no use of my arm, surely a judge would look at that when I explain there was no reason I couldn’t of filled out the form and signed on my own behalf and think he’s blatantly lying? Also they said the manhole was covered with barriers however the picture they sent shows the holes uncovered underneath the scaffold i was erecting at the time and there is no sign of any warning or barrier around or near the hole, would this be enough evidence to make a judge lean in my favour? Please let me know when you have a spare minute thank you ian

        Reply
        • Ian Morris

          It is impossible to say for certain which way a Judge will lean when considering a claim and defence. However, the more ‘holes’ you can pick in the defendants defence, the better and as long as your Solicitor is willing to pursue your claim, you should pursue it and try to highlight the discrepancies within the defendants version of events.

          Reply
  78. graham

    I had a accident in 2017 at a industrial park, i went to buy a car and he was washing a truck down with another person. We spoke for 10 mins so i agreed to buy the car the following week, shook hands and i began to walk away towards my vehicle when all of a sudden i slipped back very fast onto hard floor flat on my back, the pain was bad. I noticed when i looked at them they just looked at me and didn’t even bother to help me up, i started to get up slowly and i when put my hand on my back as the pain was bad all this chemical went on my hands, a grey liquid like chemical vaseline type. I said what’s this on the floor and on my hands, he said sorry mate i don’t know anything about it, must of came of one of these trucks.
    My son was sat in my car, he seen me fall too, he is autistic, as i drove out of these premises i went round the corner to pick up my ex and her work college from work. They seen the state i was in, chemicals on my coat and sore back and neck. I made a appointment straight away with my doc same day so i could be looked at. She said i have whiplash, she didn’t know what the chemical was, i went a&e few days later and i contacted a no win no fee solicitor. He took the case on from 2017 and has been trying to contact them from the start, they hadn’t been answering his letters now they are denying any accident has happened. This has led to my solicitor saying to me today it might be difficult to prove my word against there’s and it’s not looking good for my case.

    I told him can’t it go to court where a judge can decide. He said no because it will cost me.I am feeling down now as i was injured, my back neck and with the chemical on my hands not knowing what it was my health is getting worse. The trucks in that compound carry hazardous chemical waste, so now i am worried about this with no answers. I have the coat still, it has been through the wash so i don’t know if it could be tested to see what was on it. I am now worried about my claim fearing i will lose because they say it never happened and health is getting worse. I’ve lost a stone in weight in less than year, unexpected and severe back and neck pain, my left arm has got an unexpected pain and I haven’t been able to move it back or up for 2 months. Also bowel movement change, sore hands, sometimes feel like i am seizing up. I don’t know what to do so i’ve told you hoping you could help or give me some info on what to do. These people’s family run business shouldn’t be able to get off with this by denying it ever happened, when they was there when i fell in front of the owner’s son and staff. Thank you for reading this long but true story.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The issue here is proving what happened and where. Given the lack of independent witnesses or an accident book record, it is a fairly simply matter for the defendants to simply deny any responsibility.

      Reply
      • graham

        Thanks ian for getting back to me. The problem on the day of the accident was it’s a family run business, a small yard fenced on a industrial estate with other small businesses near by which would be easier for them to say no accident happened here. Less witnesses – the only person on the site who seen me fall was my son who is autistic. Could i use my son as a witness with autism or maybe my ex-partner who was round the corner when i came out of the site injured and seen the state i was in? I did go doctors that day for the accident and a few days later. Regarding accident book i thought they as owners would have put that accident in there and i wasn’t too well after the fall and wasn’t aware of there procedures. What would you suggest i do to try prove my case?

        Reply
  79. Marion

    Hi, my work have denied liability – i had a fall down curved stairs that had no handrail, i fractured my tibia and femur. My work installed a handrail 3 days later, i was off work for 9 months can they deny liability?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Have you been represented in this claim by a specialist Solicitor? If not, it may be worth having the employers denial of liability reviewed by one of our specialist accident at work Solicitors.

      With regards to your accident, the lack of a handrail may not necessarily indicate that they were negligent and therefore liable for any injury you sustained. The fact that they had a handrail fitted 3 days after your accident could be seen as the employer acting correctly to ensure that nobody else would fall down the stairs.

      Reply
  80. Dave O'driscoll

    Hi Ian,I work on the railway on a 0 hr contract. The company I work for is a sub-contracting agency and they had me working for a large contracting firm. The large contracting firm is not accepting liability for the injury I sustained when I dropped a large concrete block on my finger tip. The injury was such that the finger tip was removed later in Hospital.

    Appropriate vehicles were not provided by the employers resulting in the accident. My lawyer reckons I have a solid claim and agrees the large company is at fault. This is his opinion that as it was their contract and the job was under their site managers instruction.,However they seem to believe my sub agency is at fault under a contract which was signed in previous years. My sub agency employer also denies responsibility.

    My lawyer has given them 5 weeks, which ends next Tuesday or he is willing to take both to court (after a further 2 week cooling off period if nobody’s accepted responsibility).

    They’re really both blaming each other. Both believe they have a good case in defence. What will happen in the end? Could it really go to court or will somebody accept liability and work to settle the claim appropriately? Also is this better financially for me it going to court? Many thanks

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Given your current Solicitors view that you have a solid claim it is a good indicator that someone is liable and in this case, it can only be one of (or both!) two parties – the sub contractor for whom you work or the main contract holder for whom you were operating on the day.

      If neither party is willing to accept liability the only solution would be to put it before a court and allow a judge to make a decision. Whilst it is not that common in the UK for personal injury claims to reach court, the court process is there to resolve issues such as the one you cite.

      Reply
  81. simon

    Hi Ian, Hope you can help, I’m a landlord and have a tenant that fell while holding his child, on the unadopted road leading to my property. He has injured himself quite badly and has now put in a claim. I have no ownership of the road whatsoever and no maintenance company. However, I do have a shared responsibility for the cost of the maintenance on the road on my deeds, keeping it maintain has been an issue getting everyone to agree as a result the road is in a mess and he has tripped as a result and is claiming against the nearest property to the trip which isn’t myself .. Should i be worried ?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      As you will appreciate, it is hard to give specific advice without understanding the nature of the accident site and location. Given that there is a shared responsibility for maintenance of the unadopted road, it could be that all parties with shared responsibility could be held liable. However, if the tenant’s Solicitor is addressing the claim to one property owner then it could be that they are the only ones to face action.

      You mention that there has been difficulty in reaching agreement on the maintenance of the road. It would be helpful to you if you and any others who have been willing to cooperate support each other by outlining the collective efforts you have made to have the area repaired and also indicate those who have failed to cooperate and therefore caused the issues at hand.

      Reply
  82. Phil

    On holiday in May (in Sri Lanka), my foot went through a drain cover alongside the pool and I went down the hole up to my knee. My calf was bruised and grazed but throughout the rest of the holiday the pain got gradually worse to the point it was keeping me awake and I was in pain on walking. On seeking medical advice on my return I was found to have a DVT and was advised that it was more than likely to have been caused by the injury. I have had a solicitor acting on my behalf and after 6 months the travel company insurers have responded denying liability stating that they have spoken to all staff on duty that day in the area and nobody remembers the incident. When I fell I was aided by at least 2 members of staff one being a barman who gave me a bag of ice and I believe the other was a pool attendant. I have two independent witnesses to the incident also. There was also CCTV cameras in the area, however as they have taken so long to respond I don’t know if footage would still be available. My solicitor had now advised that she is no longer able to continue on a no win no fee basis as she feels it will be difficult to prove the DVT would be caused by the injury (even though no medical opinion has been sought by them) and because they deny liability. As I have independent witnesses to the incident and several other people that were aware of the issues I suffered after it whilst on holiday I feel I want to pursue my claim especially given that it has had a huge impact on my life. (It developed into pulmonary embolism and I spent 2 weeks hospitalised). I feel that the solicitor fell at the first hurdle in that she did not challenge their denial in any way even though they appear to have investigated their records for the incorrect incident date. Is this worth pursuing?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      When a Solicitor fails with a claim or opts to close the matter, it usually indicates a serious problem with the strength of the claim and therefore it may be likely that a new Solicitor would reach the same point of view. However, this is not necessarily the case and it could be that a new Solicitor takes a different view.

      To that end, we can arrange for one of our specialist Solicitor partners to speak with you and give an undertaking to review the file from your previous Solicitor in order that they can decide whether or not they could take the matter further on a No Win No Fee basis. We also have an article on holiday claims which might be of interest.

      Reply
  83. Lee

    Hi I had an accident while at work for a large hotel company when I was directed to use an old trolley which was in poor condition. I tested it in the morning and it wheeled out of the stock room fine. When I return to it later that day the wheel buckled while i was pushing it and became stuck, causing me back pain straight away which made me have to leave work early. I have never returned and after 7 months of sick note I was sacked one month for sending sick note late. I have started a claim in which my old employer are claiming my accident happened the day before (which is a lie) so are disputing it even though it’s in the accident book. My lawyer is now in the process of seeking advice from a barrister. He said even though the accident is recorded I booked my first visit to the doctors 2 and a half months after it happened, which I have explained i was self medicating before my doctors was a bit out the way and the painkillers were helping. I also didn’t seek legal advice until around 8 weeks after the fact because i was hoping to return to work. I’m with a no win no fee company and they do not want to move forward until we hear back from the barrister. Do you think I have a claim. It’s been over a year now since it happened and my back pain has gotten worse instead of better I haven’t been able to return to employment and i feel like this hasn’t only ruined my life but also my 14 year old daughter as it’s as if she has now become my carer, this accident has completely change our life. Thank you for any advice you can give.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      It is important for the Barristers (counsel) opinion to be received as this will give strong indication as to the likely outcome of the claim and will also give expert perspective as to the best way forward for you and your Solicitor.

      Reply
  84. Geoff

    Hi you have been recommended to me and I am going to put a claim through yourselves. 4 weeks ago a car hit the front drivers side of vehicle after pulling out of a junction. They admitted liability and I have it on dashcam. My insurance company also confirmed was non fault on my side. I have had the vehicle repaired.
    Now 4 weeks on I have noticed my Lower back is increasing in pain and I have slight pain in right side of neck. Maybe whiplash? I noticed this with a week of accident but not going away so I think I’m within my rights to make a claim and am going to pursue this.
    I have a question before I do this.
    In 2014 a vehicle drove into rear of my vehicle. Again they admitted liability and my insurance company recommended a solicitor as I had a couple of minor injuries. I went for medical that solicitor organised and few month after was successful in the claim.
    Now I know that if you take this claim for me and I have a medical examination they will ask about previous accidents. As I have nothing to hide I would tell them about this but the issue is I can not remember the exact injuries I got. I rang my gp as I want to know exactly what they were but they told me they have no record of any injuries from then. They went on to explain that if a solicitor instructed a medical examination it would not be sent to the gp as it is a private and the solicitor would have it on file. The problem is I can not remember who the solicitor was.
    So what would happen at the medical examination if I can not remember the injuries. They were minor but if my gp has no record and I can’t get the record what would i do?
    I just want to be fully prepared before I pursue this claim.
    Thank you

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      We look forward to helping you make your claim for compensation. The question you ask is a valid one and it is important to consider medical evidence and to note any previous or pre-existing injuries/conditions when making any claim.

      The answer to your main question is easily provided. If you attended your GP or a Hospital at any stage after the 2014 incident, your medical records will make note of any symptoms you reported and any treatments provided. If you did not report anything to your GP or a Hospital, the only record of any previous injuries will be within your previous Solicitors file of papers. If you do not have any record of who you instructed it is not possible for you to obtain that information. However, we do not feel that you need be concerned. The best course of action would be to disclose this to our specialist Solicitor at the very outset of the claims process and act on their advice as to what you should state and when.

      Reply
      • Geoff

        OK thank you this is helpful. Obviously I would volunteer to the medical examiner that I have been in a previous accident and the injuries were minor I just don’t t want to be in a position if it went to court, not likely I know but if it did for me to look like I am trying to hide something if they was to have that medical report but as you say only the solicitor would have a access to it. Is it possible the courts could get it even if I don’t know where it is? I appreciate the advice and will call you after Christmas it’s just good to know where I stand before I start the process and as I said you have been highly recommend and thank you.

        Reply
  85. Shaun Mellor

    Hello Ian, I wonder if you could help.I am in the process of making a claim for compensation against my local council for a trip on a public path. initially my solicitor seemed to think my claim was legitimate but this is the response from the Councils insurers.
    I find some of their comments strange and the pictures they presented are very selective and do not show the whole picture!

    The Council have investigated the circumstances surrounding your accident which we understand occurred on 9/10/2018. You will be aware that there is no automatic right to compensation in such circumstances and the Council, as Highway Authority, will only become liable to pay compensation when the accident can be said to have arisen due to fault on their part.

    To comply with their duties under the Highways Act 1980 the Council operate a system for inspection and maintenance of the roads and footpaths for which they are responsible. The locus where the accident occurred is examined on a regular 6 monthly basis and at the date of the last inspection prior to the accident, which took place on 18/4/2018 , no actionable defect was evident nor have there been any subsequent reports submitted to the Council notifying them of a problem at this location. A further inspection was carried out 6 days after your accident, again no actionable defects were observed. The Council also have no knowledge of any other work undertaken by contractors that may have contributed towards the defect.

    The defect is a degraded section of bitmac near the kerb. You will see from the SCO photographs that the abrupt edge is less than 20mm and we do not consider it to be dangerous, particularly as the abrupt edge runs along the length of the footpath, not the width. Notwithstanding that we do not consider the defect to be dangerous (the writer and SCO live very close by to this area and the footpath has been in that condition for years) we have taken a decision to repair the area on a non-priority basis, as the footpath is very close to the entrance of Percy Hedley School and the area is used by a number of wheelchair users.

    On the basis of the information presented we consider that the Council have complied with their duties under the Highways Act 1980 and we see no evidence that it has arisen due to neglect or breach of duty on their part. Whilst we are very sorry to learn of this accident liability is denied and we are unable to make any offer of compensation.

    McMahon Claims Handler
    Zurich Insurance plc
    5th Floor East
    Hadrian House

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The defendants appear to have a strong defence (on the basis of this letter anyway) in your claim. As such, it could prove hard to succeed with your claim.

      The letter is correct in pointing out what the courts will look for and what they will consider to be a breach of the local highways agency obligations under the Highways Act 1980. The key thing in claims for tripping accident compensation claims when someone has tripped on a public highway footpath is proving that the defect is actionable (it must usually exceed a drop or rise of 25mm or 1 inch) and that it has been in situ for a considerable period of time. The council in your case are saying that they inspected the locus just before your accident and not long after and didn’t find any defect to repair. That could spell bad news in your claim. However, all is not lost. Depending on the size of the defect, if it was in situ at the time as you claim, is there an argument that the council inspection regime is inadequate? Your Solicitor needs to find out how the inspection was carried out – on foot or drive by. If it was drive by, a Judge may agree that it was not adequate and that such a hazard would easily be missed. The other thing you can seek to do is locate a Section 58 Hazard Witness – this is not a witness to the accident, but someone with good knowledge of the area (resident or regular visitor) who has seen the hazard in situ and can vouch for the condition of it, the size and roughly how long it has been present. If you can do this and present such a statement, it will undermine the highways authority denial of liability.

      Reply
  86. rachel

    we were claiming for an accident that took place in a block of flats my partner was leaving his parent flat and when he approached the lift area he slipped, he is an amputee and was on crutches and the floor was still wet and his crutches went from under neath him making him fall on to his limb which then caused him to fracture his hip in which he had to undergo surgery and was hospitalised for over a week. they were no wet signs out to warn people of this, also they were another worker who saw they were no sign and stated they dont always put them out. but now they are claiming they are not liable and the other worker is saying the floors were dry and there was a sign out. all papers were sent to them his medical paper about his surgery ect but when they have sent a statement what they have found saying they did have sign and floors were dry ect but they have stated he had a fracture to lower leg? were this came from i don’t no as they have his discharge and what surgery he had done do we contest this.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Are you using a specialist Solicitor to pursue this claim? On face value, the claim would seem strong – wet floor, no hazard signs in situ. However, the defendants appear to be using a questionable version of events from their own staff to defend the claim.

      You should draw the discrepancies in the defendant responses to the attention of your Solicitor at the earliest opportunity and contest this further.

      Reply
  87. Kevin

    Hi ian, i had an injury at work my claim is at 50/50 at the minute, even if i accept this would i still receive some compensation?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The simple answer is yes! In claims where a claimants has to accept an element of contributory negligence with regards to how they came to be injured, they will still receive compensation. However, the amount received will be lower than if they were able to attach 100% liability to the defendant.

      Reply
  88. Lucie

    A few days ago we had an electrician and a plumber coming to fix our toilet. They could not fix it as apparently we need a new pipe. There is a manhole in front of our house which they opened and inspected. A few days later, I was reaching for a plastic recycling box when I stood on the manhole and fell in to it with a half of my body and injured myself. I have a nasty bruise on my hip, my knee and I am also having a problem with my back. I went to the Doctor and got some anti-inflammatory tablets and was advised to come back if needed. What can i do to make a claim? Shall I call the company first to let them know what happened and see what they say?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If you fell through the manhole because the workers who had lifted the cover a few days previously had failed to replace it securely (negligence) you do have a right to make a claim for compensation. In your case, the main issue is likely to be proving that the manhole cover had either been replaced incorrectly or that it was not safe. As such, you should definitely report the accident to the company who came out to attend your property and advise them that you have fallen through the manhole cover.

      Hopefully you have some photographic evidence of the manhole cover fallen through after your accident? If so, this could provide some useful evidence to support a claim for compensation. If you do have photographs, please email them to us (justice@direct2compensation.co.uk) so that we can review them and advise you further as to your claim for compensation.

      Reply
  89. Chris

    Accident at work and employment issues work deny responsibility.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The employment issues you mention are something that you should immediately discuss with a specialist employment law Solicitor. With regards to the accident at work issue, please elaborate in terms of what happened to you and we can then advise you as to whether or not you can make a claim for accident at work compensation.

      Reply
  90. Sammi

    Hi Ian,

    Just curious as to a possible situation similar to what you describe above but wondering who is liable. Situation – drunk person falls down a staircase in a block of flats run by the residents with share of free hold and the building insurance has denied liability. Who’s now liable if the claim is persued? Are the residents personal assets in danger or does it end with the residents association with the only asset being the freehold itself?

    Thanks in advance.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The individual residents would not face personal liability, any liability would go with the building management company or insurance. However, more importantly, if someone fell down the stairs, to succeed with a claim for compensation, they would have to demonstrate that the stairs were hazardous and that the building management company knew of the hazard and were liable. You mention that the person who fell was drunk. If their intoxication was the cause of their fall, they have no claim.

      Reply
      • Sammi

        Hi Ian, thank you for the answer. What would happen in the circumstance of the residents not having a management company and taking care of things themselves. Where does the buck stop exactly in this event?

        Reply
        • Ian Morris

          If the residents are tenants, they would have no relationship to any action that may follow. If the residents own the premises and communal areas, there is a possibility that the ‘shared ownership’ group could have a joint responsibility should any action be taken. However, what is really at issue is the cause of any incident that lead to any action. Was there negligence? If so, by whom? Was it reasonable to expect those that own the premises or have responsibility for the maintenance and management of the premises to have prevented the incident?

          Reply
  91. karen

    I do a market stall on a Tuesday flea market but the person who has my stall on the new market weds fri and sat put up mental bars in a step shape. I asked the market manger to remove the bars for months. 3 weeks ago a member of the public fell over the bars and i’m disputing the claim as the bars do not belong to me nor did I put the bars up the bloke who owns the the bars has admitted the bars are his but because he wasn’t using the stall on the Tuesday he is not liable, am I right to dispute this?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Given our expertise as a representative of people making claims for personal injury compensation, the question you raise of defending a claim against you is something that should be addressed to your Public Liability insurance provide rather than us.

      However, if you did not erect the bars and had requested that they be removed you may have a good defence to present.

      Reply
  92. aurelius

    Hi, I have an accident at work. I worked as a self-employed in LTD company. In that company, I worked for more than 3 years. And my taxes were deducted and I was paid by weekly wages every week, the company was paying for some of my tools I never worked for the price work or in other jobs without the company knowing.
    1. Can I be described as an employed?
    2. I worked in the building and I was told about the hazard day before from another person (not the boss) as he never came on site that day. But no one did anything to prevent the accident no signs or barriers were placed only by word of the mouth :/ day before. Is that my fault for an accident as I been told day before?
    3. Who will be responsible if a company don`t have employe liability insurance and have only public liability and public liability decides to not take that case? Is that mean if in a company bank account £1 only, so for me no point to even claim?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The situation/scenario you describe is exactly why No Win No Fee personal injury compensation claim services are so vital and important. You have clearly had an accident that was not your fault – the employer should have ensured that the hazard was clearly marked or blocked with barriers. Their failure to do this puts them in breach of Health and Safety regulations.

      Although you are unsure as to the insurance cover held by the employer and have concerns about how any claim against the employer will be handled at their end, you can pursue the matter with us on a No Win No Fee basis, safe in the knowledge that should the defendant either not have appropriate cover/funds to settle your claim or if the claim were to fail, you would not have to pay any costs.

      At Direct2Compensation we will assess the prospects of your claim and then our specialist Solicitors will run a risk assessment. If we decide that we will pursue your claim on a No Win No Fee basis, we take the financial risk should the claim fail and not you.

      Reply
  93. Helz

    I was hit by a driver who was taxed and insured. I have the police investigating as another driver has dash can footage of the incident. Completely the other drivers fault but he is saying he sold the car on that day (convienent) and is not admitting fault. Do I have a case?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Yes, you have a valid claim for road traffic accident compensation in this matter. Ideally, the Police will demonstrate that the driver is the person claiming to have sold the car (if the dash cam footage provides such evidence). If the Police can do this, you will be able to claim against their insurance for the damage to your vehicle, your personal injury and any loss of income or incurred costs. However, if the Police cannot prove that the driver was there and the sale of the car story proves to be true, you can still pursue a claim for compensation, but not against the insurers. You would have to address any claim through the MIB uninsurerd/untraced driver scheme, which would enable you to pursue a claim for personal injury and loss of income but perhaps not for the damage to your vehicle.

      At Direct2Compensation, our specialist Solicitors can assist you with a No Win No Fee claim for compensation on either basis.

      Reply
  94. Claire

    I had a fall last year on ice. The restaurants fire exits were open all night without supervision which led onto a area which was poorly light and I slipped on ice hitting my chin full force off the ground I tried to get up and it was so bad the exact same thing happened a second time. This caused severe Whiplash and has also caused my jaw bone to be out of place. I’ve been dealing with back and neck pain for 11 months now which is managed with prescribed pain medication. The restaurants insurers have still not come back with a decision on liability (which they should have by September) do I have strong case?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Essentially, if a hazard has been allowed to remain present – such as this ice – as a result of negligence or inaction, you can pursue a claim with confidence.

      In your case, it would be a good idea for us to have a telephone conversation regarding your accident and the events of the past year of dealing with the insurers in order that we can get a full understanding as to what happened and how.

      We can then advise you properly as to your prospects of succeeding with a claim for compensation.

      Reply
  95. Aurelijus

    Hi, I have an accident at work and it is 100% employer fault. I have solicitors and is 5 months gone after claim start and I still can`t get any answers from my solicitors. Them saying them still not get any response from the third party insurer. Question how long it can take for third party insurance to take response denying or accept the case? Thanks

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Defendant insurers are afforded a lengthy period to respond to a claim. From the date of a claim being submitted, they can take up to around 4 months to respond. If they do not respond within that time frame, the Solicitor will put them on notice that they need to respond within a certain time frame (usually a further 4-6 weeks) or face court action.

      You should contact your Solicitor to see if they are going to take the matter to court to force the 3rd party insurer to cooperate.

      Reply
  96. Patricia stephens

    Why, after 2 years of claiming personal injury compensation for an accident in which I severed my finger on a closing door whilst coming out of a Doctors room, are my Solicitors raising concerns about my case? They are saying it is a hard case to prove as I have to prove that the door was faulty. So, now 2 years on, they are sending an engineer to check the door in the surgery. Surely it is now too late? I am thinking of a second opinion – could you advise?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      I would imagine that your Solicitors are acting on the basis of a defence or denial of liability from the defendant insurers and yes, it is beholden upon you and your Solicitor to prove your claim – which would be to argue that the door was faulty. If the door is shown to be satisfactory you may struggle with your claim.

      As long as the door is the same as it was when you were injured, the fact that 2 years have passed since your accident will not matter as the engineer will be able to find any possible hazards and report them to your Solicitor.

      I do not think it would be wise or helpful to switch Solicitors at this stage.

      Reply
  97. Paul Wimhurst

    I went on an instructor led horse riding trek in the UK. I am an experienced rider, however this trek was a walk for beginners, of whom my partner is one. I signed a form detailing my level of expertise etc, which included the line “I am aware that horse back riding is a dangerous activity and I ride at my own risk”.

    A horse was presented to me already saddled up, and ready to go, at a mounting block. There was no opportunity or instruction for me to check any equipment. On the ride my saddle slipped fully round the horse, but fortunately I felt it move and jumped off to one side landing on my feet.
    The instructor came over, and refitted the saddle, and i carried on with the ride. 5 minutes later the saddle slipped fully to the right, this time with no opportunity to react. I hit the ground, landing on one side.
    The instructor then came back and swapped my saddle for the one on the horse she was riding, stating that the saddle was too small. I managed to get back on and continue the last 10 mins of the ride.
    She contacted the stable owner to inform him of the accident by telephone. On return to the stable, both the owner and the instructor left within minutes with another trek, and with no-one to speak to I went home.
    I presented at the hospital that night and was found to have a fractured shoulder, full torn rotator cuff and depression injury. I have since had surgery, with an 18-24 month rehabilitation.

    My personal injury solicitors haven’t taken statements in the 6 months since the accident (I claimed the same week as the injury was sustained), and have basically made no headway.
    I have today found out that the insurer has denied responsibility.
    My questions are twofold – one is that although I rode at my own risk, I was surely within my rights to expect the equipment provided to be adequate and safe.
    Secondly, although my claim handler will be going back with further information to the insurer, I have little or no faith that I am being represented properly, can I change solicitors at this stage without cost to me?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      To answer your first point, yes – the riding stables have a responsibility to provide safe and secure equipment. In this case the saddle appears to have a fault that should have been located during maintenance and inspection of the equipment. On that score, there is a claim to be made and it is for the stables to mount a robust defence if they believe they can.

      On the second point, yes – you can switch Solicitors if you can find a new Solicitor willing to take over the running of the claim. In most cases, a new Solicitor will give a written undertaking to the previous Solicitor to cover any costs incurred by them as and when a claim succeeds. However, it is not always in your best interests to switch Solicitors and should only be done as a last resort. To that end, before you reach that point you should make a formal complaint to your existing Solicitors so that your grievance can be aired, investigated and hopefully settled. The Solicitors with whom your instructions lay at this time should have a complaints procedure published on their website. Refer to that and go through the process with them. If they are unable to resolve your complaint, you can at that point seek to switch firms.

      Reply
  98. Sarah Kocak

    Hi I was involved in a rear end shunt back in Feb ’18. The 3rd party insurer admitted liability the very same day, via phone call. I was in a lease car that was provided by another insurance company following a previous 3rd party collision, yes I’ve had a run of bad luck!!! I underwent physio, which ended in June ’18. My problem is this, the solicitors I instructed were recommended to me by the lease car company whose car had been rear ended. At every step, I have had to contact them for updates and to find out what’s happening. I have now been told the 3rd party insurer, wish to examine the lease car to ascertain the damage sustained. Accident happened on 10th February!!! And I’ve been advised ” that until all heads of claim have been dealt with ” that my claim for personal injuries are now put on a back burner until the car has been examined. Is this the case?! In my own head I’m thinking that I instructed the solicitors to deal with my injuries and the damage to both cars would be done between the 3rd party insurer and the lease company because the damage to both cars is not my fault, as already admitted and accepted by the 3rd parties insurer on the day!!!

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      You should demand a full explanation of the circumstances from the people pursuing your claim in order that they can explain the situation to you in a way that satisfies your concerns. You could make a formal complaint against them if you feel it relevant.

      Reply
  99. Shay mitchell

    I’m dealing with the insurance company of a large store. There was ice on a parking lot and I broke my ankle and have been off work for a few months. The insurance company for the parking lot maintenance company sent me an email and it said please be advised that this is a liability issue and that they would get back to me as soon as they have the rest of my medical records. Does that mean they accept the liability or does it mean they don’t know who’s liable?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      It is hard to be certain what they mean, so it would be worthwhile clarifying with them as to whether they are accepting responsibility or not.

      Reply
  100. Jacqui

    I tripped over a manhole cover and the council said as the depth was between 10mm and 12mm they were not liable. They said they inspect the pavements regularly and they did not admit liability. I’ve a broken elbow, torn ligaments to my hand recovery us going to take months. All due to tripping over the lowered manhole cover. Seems most unfair.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Given the injuries you sustained when you tripped over the raised access cover, I can understand why you feel that the local authorities refusal to accept any liability is unfair.

      However, if the hazard protruded by 10-12mm from the surrounding surface, it is unlikely that a court would find the highways agency liable in this matter. In previous case law, it has been decided that an actionable tripping hazard should exceed or fall below the surrounding surface level by 25mm or more. Further, in your case it sounds as if the local authority can demonstrate that they regularly inspect the highways and footpaths in their area and this would give them a solid defence should any claim proceed.

      Reply
  101. Jocelyn prosser

    I recently got injured by an automatic door in a petrol station. As I stood in the doorway calling to my friend out on the forecourt, my head became trapped in the door as it shut on me. I couldn’t get free for a bit, but after a frenzied attempt I freed myself. I have had a previous neck surgery, resulting in a titanium three level cage. The stress of this incident has created so much pain and discomfort for me.

    I requested the CCTV footage from the petrol station the following day. However they said they didn’t have any footage so I contacted my local authority about the door. As a result of my reporting the door to the local authority, the door was examined by health and safety and deemed safe. However they were told there was footage of my accident. When I asked if they had watched it they said they hadn’t! I am really frustrated that I was told there wasn’t any footage but have now found out that health and safety did not watch it.

    I have had to have an x-ray on my neck, had physio, taken strong painkillers and have had to ask social services to give me support as I am a full time carer. I feel deeply affected by what happened to me – which was witnessed by my friend. I have contacted the garage directly now and said that I have been advised to request the footage under the data protection act, but I cannot work out why the health and safety inspector checking the doors did not look at the footage. Do you feel I have a case?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      We have previously pursued and succeeded with claims where people have been injured by an automatic door that has closed on them unexpectedly. The type of door you were injured by would usually have some sort of sensor fitted that ensures that the door opens when someone is within the sensor range and prevents it from closing if there is something in the way. Although the health and safety inspector who checked the door found it to be safe during their inspection, it would appear that the sensor had a fault on the day on which you were injured.

      You have done the right things following your accident to protect your rights going forward – reporting the matter to both the garage in question and your local authority. You have also had medical treatment. As such, my initial view is that you should pursue a claim for compensation. We work on a fully no win no fee basis so you would be able to pursue a claim without risking your own finances.

      We would be very happy to pursue this matter for you.

      Reply
  102. Rebekah

    I slipped on a wet floor. When I got up (being helped by a member of public) I noticed a staff member was washing the floors. I didn’t see any wet sign notices. I was on a lot of pain as I twisted my ankle and hurt me knee. I left very quickly because it was quite public and most of the staff were laughing about it.
    However I did ask to see the cctv of the incident. They refused and passed the matter on to their insurers.
    I didn’t take time off work because had two weeks holiday (it ruined my holiday). Also I knew I had just soft tissue damage because nothing more serious (so didn’t go to the hospital).
    It has taken them over 15 weeks to come back to me about liability and I have a feeling they will deny liability.
    I have no idea what to do next.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      You definitely need a specialist personal injury Solicitor with good knowledge and experience with occupier liability claims to make sure that you succeed with your claim for compensation.

      We have some real experts in this area, so if you don’t already have a Solicitor acting for you, call us on 01225430285. Our team will take some initial information and then pass your claim to the right specialist Solicitor who will act for you.

      Reply
  103. Malcolm Mawby

    I had an accident where the courts found i was not liable, can my insurance company still refuse my claim for damages?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If you are not liable, it would indicate that someone/another business is liable. As such, any claim for damages should be addressed to the liable party rather than through your own insurers.

      If you would like help to make a claim for compensation, please call us on 01225430285 or use our ‘start a claim’ page.

      Reply
  104. Michelle Matson

    My husband was walking our dog on New Years Eve, our dog was happily playing with a German shepherd and after a while my husband called our dog back (Labrador) who came back immediately, my husband turned to continue his walked unaware the German shepherd had decided to chase our dog running full pelt into my husbands leg, snapping his knee in two places, resulting in a tibial plateau fracture which required ORIF surgery leaving him 7months (ongoing) recovery.
    The dog owner admitted liability, happily gave us her insurance details and a claim for compensation was put forward only to receive a letter from said insurance company denying any and all liability, stating her dog wasn’t running although my husbands surgeon told us he usually sees this kind of injury by a collision with a car.

    My husband has had a Dexa scan which confirmed his bone density is normal so we can’t understand how they can blantantly lie when the injury clearly proves otherwise.

    We would very much like to pursue this claim and would welcome your advice with proceeding.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      How frustrating! You describe what seems a straightforward case but this is clearly a ‘case’ of one persons word against another. Despite the German Shepherd’s owners initial admission of liability and provision of her insurance details, who knows what she has said to her own insurers when they have asked her for her version of events.

      Do you have any independent witnesses who can add weight to your Husband’s version of events?

      Reply
      • Michelle Matson

        Thanks for your response, there were not witnesses to the accident but she told two paramedics her dog had rub into him as well as up to 50 people offering to help as unfortunately being New Year’s Eve the ambulance took 2.5 hrs to get there, I believe some of these witnesses could be found if needed as a lot of locals were out walking that morning. Her insurance company are not disputing her dog caused the accident, their reason for no liability is that our dog was also off the lead and that my husband clearly knew the dog was going to collide with him so he should’ve moved

        Reply
  105. N Ahmd

    We were hit by a car on the motorway – it was side impact and the driver of the vehicle claims that “they think” another car was turning into her lane which made her swerve and subsequently hit us. The police report confirms that she hit us and her statement of another car however there are no witnesses to this phantom car. There is no cctv available as the camera was not facing the right way. Is this clean cut to claim? I have a ruptured bicep & psychological damage as I have not been able to drive on the motorway again.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      It would appear that you have a valid claim for road traffic accident compensation and the injuries you describe (particularly the psychological aspect) are common in such road traffic collisions on high speed roads. Whether or not the person who collided with you believed that there was a 3rd party vehicle encroaching on their lane space is somewhat irrelevant in that it was their vehicle that hit yours and as such, a claim should be made against the insurers of that vehicle. That insurer may then in turn wish to re-direct the claim to the other insurers if they can be found.

      Do you know if any admission of liability has been made with regards to vehicle repairs?

      Reply
      • N Ahmd

        Thank you for your reply. The insurance company have paid out for our car that was written off in the collision. They did not state with the payment that it was a goodwill gesture nor have they accepted liability as they are arguing it should go to MIB as the supposed “third car” is at fault .we are still out of pocket all our damaged items & holiday we were on our way to.

        Reply
  106. Ely

    I had an accident at work, I felt very dizzy while on the stairs and I fell all the way down 10 steps. The aircon hasn’t been working for more than a month, it was very hot and I believe this is the reason that I collapsed and fell.

    I hit my left leg with a big bruise, my left elbow with a superficial cut, my back and right shoulder. Nothing is fractured luckily, but I have been advised from my doctor to do some physiotherapy to recover my shoulder. Is the employer responsible?
    They are denying the existence of an insurance covering my accident and the aircon hasn’t been fixed yet with an inside temperature of 29C degrees.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      This is a difficult one as to succeed with your claim you would have to prove that the cause of your collapse was a direct result of the lack of air con. As you can imagine, this will be difficult to establish.

      Reply
      • Ely

        I understand this… not taking in consideration the reason of my fall but only the fact that I fell on the stairs a while carrying out my duties at work, is the employer responsible to take care of my recovery?
        Is working without aircon a hazard during hot season and having all other colleagues and clients complaining about the heat?

        Reply
  107. Shajoe Lake

    My daughter claims to have been indecently assaulted by a security guard at a hotel at which we were guests. The security guard has denied that anything happened. There is no evidence that what my daughter said is true as it was an indecent assault. The guard apparently hugged her and placed his tongue in her ear.

    Please advise if I may be able to successfully claim under the security guard’s employer’s public liability insurance, that is if they have?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      As you rightly point out, the problem here is the lack of independent evidence to support any claim. Whilst we have no reason to doubt your daughters version of events, without any evidence to support the claim it is unlikely that a Solicitor would be able to offer to pursue the matter on a No Win No Fee basis.

      The best thing to do – if you haven’t already done so – would be to try and obtain witness information or any other supportive evidence against the security guard and ask the Hotel if they have any CCTV footage available.

      Reply
  108. Anne

    I was injured during physical training at work but my employer is denying liability. Surely in a training setting, whereby we should be being monitored there should be no dispute as to them being at fault.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      When you say that your employer is denying liability, are you saying that you already have a claim in place and a Solicitor pursuing this for you? If not, the situation you describe is something that we would be happy to investigate for you.

      We have previously succeeded with claims against employers where staff members were injured during physical training exercises, with NHS workers injured during training as to how to handle aggressive patients being one example.

      Reply
  109. Anna

    My daughter was involved in a wing mirror clip. The other party would not exchange insurance at the scene but demanded £50 to polish out a scratch to their car. After the bank holiday weekend, they changed that to £1600. We took it to insurance and discovered they had added a ghost passenger and made two PI claims as well. They produced 2 witnesses. I found those witnesses on Facebook and the other driver ended up dropping her claim which also included a personal injury claim. The husband and ghost passenger, continue with their claims and want 50/50 – although her made up, dramatic collision story against my daughter collapsed. So it goes on, causing my daughter enormous stress and worry. Can I claim against them for mental stress and fraud?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Whilst the actions of the other driver have been extremely bad and seemingly fraudulent, for you to succeed against them with a claim for psychological stress and trauma would be difficult. This is because such a claim would not be without risk and as such, for a specialist Solicitor to pursue this claim it is unlikely that they would wish to do so on a No Win No Fee basis.

      Have you reported the other driver to the Police to allege that they have attempted to commit an act of fraud?

      Reply
    • Anna

      Should I? I had thought best to wait and see if the PI claims also collapsed before going to the Police. I don’t understand the process, but assumed that those claims would be made through a solicitor and not through the other driver’s insurer’s solicitor. How can a claim against my daughter succeed if the other driver had to drop her claim once the witness evidence was produced?

      Reply
      • Ian Morris

        The claim against your daughter should be fought by her insurers. Make sure that they are taking in to account the fraudulent actions of the 3rd party. However, if your daughter was responsible for or partially responsible for the wing mirror clip, she could be held partly liable in any claim with the other driver having responsibility for their actions.

        Reply
  110. Jenny irving

    In my case, the third party said in a telephone to me that they would pay for my car to be repaired. We still had to converse re any personal injury.

    However, the third party are now back tracking and wanting my insurers to say I won’t be filing a claim for personal injury compensation or they won’t be paying for the car damage. This person reversed in to me into me at a junction whilst driving an 18 tonne road line painter wagon.

    In my initial email to them, I said that I would be happy to discuss costs due to me but we hadn’t discussed personal injury at this time. Now they are holding me to ransom. I am now going through my insurers but they are disputing personal injury claim and are not acknowledging this. Help!

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      The situation you describe is a perfect example as to why it is so important to instruct a specialist Solicitor to deal with any claim for road traffic accident compensation and at Direct2Compensation, we have some of the best personal injury Solicitors around available to work for you. Our expert staff know your rights and can quickly obtain the initial information needed to hand your claim over to one of our specialist Solicitors who would then act for you and hold the relevant third party to account for their negligence that lead to your losses and injuries and seek to recover compensation for both for you.

      You should contact us today so that we can help take the stress out of this process for you and get the ball rolling in your favour.

      Reply
  111. Karen Kane

    Hi i was in an accident where i received multiple injuries, the other driver has accepted liability on my side but as my partner was driving – the car btw is a write off – the other driver is disputing his claim against my partner?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      As a passenger, there really should be any problem for you in terms of making a successful claim for car accident personal injury compensation as whoever was at fault, it will not be you – the passenger.

      Eventually, the liability will be attributed to either the 3rd party driver or to your partner. If the liability is placed with the 3rd party, you can claim compensation from their insurers. If it is found that your partner was at fault, you can still proceed with your claim against their insurance. You really need not worry as whoever is found to be at fault will already have a claim against them for the damage to the vehicles. Therefore, if you then add a personal injury claim on top of that, it won’t change anything in terms of insurance renewal or cost.

      We can help you with this claim, please call us on 01225430285.

      Reply
  112. L Hamilton

    Had an injury in work spent three weeks in hospital. Fractured back. Since then had a visit from the h.s.e. he made a report and told me that he had found safety breaches at the site, told me to get a solicitor. What’s my chances of an injury claim?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      If someone from the HSE is telling you that you should instruct a Solicitor, it would appear that you have a valid claim for work accident compensation. We would love to help you with this serious matter. I’d only need a few minutes on the phone with you at the outset in order to be able to then identify the right specialist Solicitor with relevant experience to pursue this claim for you.

      Reply
  113. Tinyefun Kool

    Hi, I got injured at work while taking off hot ampules off the conveyor due to the wrong gloves I was given. An ampule got stuck in a guard smashed through the gloves into the index finger. I had to go the hospital for operation to remove a glass foreign body. I have not worked for three months. How much do you think my claim would be worth?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      It is not possible to tell you for certain how much your finger injury claim could be worth without having seen medical evidence and read a medical experts report in to the extent of the injury and whether any long term damage (such as nerve damage) was caused to you.

      What we can say is that your claim valuation will increase if your scarring remains visible, if there is any nerve damage or loss of dexterity of the finger due to the scarring. At Direct2Compensation, our specialist Solicitors will ensure that your claim is settled at the maximum possible value and they will also ensure that any lost income and costs incurred by you as a result of your injury and enforced absence from work are recovered for you by way of the special damages element of your claim.

      Reply
  114. claire

    hi I slipped in a supermarket in may 2017. I was advised by the the store first aider that there was a pool of liquid by me which I had skidded on. There were no wet floor signs and I slipped by the pharmacy desk where there were 3 cctv cameras in operation. The staff on duty asked if I wanted the incident reporting to their incident line and they did this in my presence whilst I was awaiting the ambulance.
    I was taken to the AE department where I was diagnosed with a fractured elbow, likely fractured bone in my spine and severely sprained ankle, I spent 2 nights in hospital and I am still undergoing physiotherapy now.
    The supermarket have denied liability and in their words, they have provided the appropriate documentation to demonstrate that they have safe systems of work in place, however they state that they have no CCTV footage of the event.
    My solicitor has indicated that there may be no way of telling how long the liquid was on the floor. I have received the cleaning schedule from that day and there was only 1x housekeeper on to clean a superstore in conjunction with this on the incident report it states initially that they had retained the CCTV footage and then further down that they hadnt, giving no rationale for why they did or did not retain it. The incident report also states the area I fell in was not cleaned and the area I fell in is not made referance to on the cleaning schedule. I would be really grateful for any advise you could give me on this matter

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      You have certainly suffered some very nasty injuries in this accident and the severity of them proves that what can initially appear to be an innocuous accident can lead to very serious injuries in slipping accidents.

      The issue that is causing problems in your claim is a common one that affects many slipping accident compensation claimants in that the lack of a hazard sign being on display is not in and of itself enough to enable a claimant to succeed. Previously, the courts have been fairly lenient with the defendants in slipping accident compensation when it comes to a claimant having to prove that the spillage or item on the floor was there for a sufficiently long period of time that the defendant ought to have been able to notice it, place a sign out and arrange a clean up. It is for this reason that businesses such as supermarkets maintain a hand written log of cleaning inspections and housekeeping work. To summarised, the courts have basically said that as long as a business can demonstrate that it has an adequate cleaning regime and regular inspections of each area of their premises they will not be held liable if someone were to slip and fall. In essence, this is usually taken as the supermarket having to check each aisle of their store at least every 30 minutes. If they can provide a log that shows this, it is unlikely a claim will succeed against them. The courts have found that if a shopper were to drop an item and caused a spillage, it would be unreasonable to expect the store staff to notice, erect a hazard sign and begin clean up unless the item had been on the floor for more than 30 minutes. Of course, without CCTV, it is very hard to have the evidence to support your claim as it cannot be proven that the spillage was on the floor for 30 minutes or more.

      Reply
  115. karyn warwick

    hi – while on a short break in a caravan – the steps of the caravan completely came away from the side of the caravan while i was stepping down them. injury occured to my leg and hand (still sore 5 months later) – contacted a well known solicitor who has only just told me they are not willing to take my case to court as caravan site can prove they had the relevant quarterly inspection records for the steps and that no other accidents like this have ever happened. bitterly disappointed as we have photos of corroded holes in caravan, photos of the stairs lying on the ground,, photos of my injuries.. just because they say the have inspected the stairs and they couldnt have forseen this happening im left with nothing but memories of a ruined holiday and a sore leg. fair?

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Karyn

      I can appreciate that the news your previous Solicitor has given you is disappointing and left you feeling somewhat let down. This is understandable, given that you have suffered a painful injury and also had a ruined holiday.

      The courts have taken a view that as long as a landowner carries out regular inspections and has an appropriate maintenance regime in place, that they can be absolved of liability should a hazard arise in the periods between inspections. The key thing here though is that the inspections MUST be adequate and that the maintenance regime must carry out adequate repair work.

      However, on the basis of you having photographic evidence of corroded holes on the caravan it may be that your Solicitor could argue that their inspection regime was inadequate in that the corrosion would not have developed in a 3 month period. Indeed, an argument here would be that the inspection carried out previously should have noted signs of corrosion if it were an adequate and thorough inspection. This would have have lead to maintenance work being carried out that would have avoided your accident and injury.

      Whilst we cannot guarantee that we could re-open the claim and succeed, we would certainly be able to have one of our partner solicitors obtain the file of papers from your previous solicitor to review them and then discuss with you as to whether or not they feel that there is a sound argument to be made about the inspection regime being inadequate.

      I hope that this helps.

      Yours sincerely

      Ian

      Reply
  116. Angelina Manuel

    My partner suffered a back injury at work during a compulsory training exercise he had to do. He had to rely on two other female trainees to keep him help up during a grappling exercise

    Unfortunately they couldn’t hold his weight and he was dropped on the mat and badly hurt his back (he has an existing back problem which was declared on initial employment with the company and before the training exercise itself)

    He was in unbearable pain and was shaking and was nauseas. An ambulance was rung and he was taken to local community hospital.

    This put him out of work for some time, he has been appointed a solicitor through the union he was with at the time and they have since said that the third party insurer are not accepting any liability…

    Please can you advise based on the information if you think there is reasonable prospects, I’m not sure he is getting the support and help from the solicitors.

    Reply
    • Ian Morris

      Angelina

      Hi, we are currently helping a few claimants with claims following injuries sustained in exactly the same scenario. Whilst their claims have not yet succeeded, they are progressing well and we our partner solicitors advise that they are confident of succeeding with these matters.

      On the basis of your description, the employer would have appeared to have been negligent in failing to note your Husband’s disclosed back injury problem and for not adequately risk assessing the mandatory training with regards to his known medical history.

      If the claim being made via the union solicitor is not progressing well, we would be more than happy to have one of our specialist solicitors review the file and if they felt that it were practical, they would be able to take over the running of the claim for your husband.

      Reply
Direct2Compensation Personal Injury Claims

Speak with a claims expert

We're happy to answer any questions you might have, or let you know if you are eligible to claim. Just fill out the form below. You can also call us on 01225 430285.